ASSESSING SPECIFIC LANGUAGE NEEDS OF NURSING STUDENTS: LECTURERS’ PERSPECTIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/dp59ra41Keywords:
Curriculum Development, Lecturers’ Perspective, ,Need AnalysisAbstract
Effective communication is essential for safe and compassionate nursing care, yet language proficiency remains a persistent challenge for many nursing students. As healthcare settings grow increasingly complex and interdisciplinary, the ability to navigate both academic and clinical discourse becomes essential. This study explores the specific language needs of nursing students through interviews with English nursing lecturers. The research finding highlights three key areas of language proficiency: communication skills in clinical settings, academic language skills, and terminology proficiency. Lecturers emphasized the necessity for nursing students to master medical vocabulary to enhance patient interactions and interdisciplinary collaboration. Furthermore, the ability to critically engage with academic literature is essential for evidence-based practice, a cornerstone of modern nursing. The study also reveals the importance of practical applications of language skills, particularly through simulation exercises and role-playing, which foster confidence and fluency in clinical communication. By identifying these specific language needs, the research aims to inform curriculum development and instructional strategies, primarily enhancing the preparation of nursing students for their professional roles in a complex healthcare environment. This study underscores the need for targeted language learning to equip future nurses with the skills necessary to provide high-quality patient care.
References
Albaharna, A. M., Aloqaili, A. A., Alshahrani, S. S., Aldilbah, F. A., Aljohani, O. A., & Aljohani, K. A. (2024). Building Effective Communication Skills for High-Stress Hospital Settings. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE SCIENCES, 04(12), 1031–1037. https://doi.org/10.52533/johs.2024.41252
Ali, P. A., & Johnson, S. (2017). Speaking my patient’s language: bilingual nurses’ perspective about provision of language concordant care to patients with limited English proficiency. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(2), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13143
Ali, P. A., & Watson, R. (2018). Language barriers and their impact on provision of care to patients with limited English proficiency: Nurses’ perspectives. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(5–6), e1152–e1160. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14204
Armour, T., Coffey, E., Manias, E., Redley, B., & Nicholson, P. (2025). Development of mobile educational applications designed for nurses: A narrative review. Nurse Education Today, 147, 106576. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEDT.2025.106576
Calma, K. R. B., Halcomb, E., & Stephens, M. (2019). The impact of curriculum on nursing students’ attitudes, perceptions and preparedness to work in primary health care: An integrative review. In Nurse Education in Practice (Vol. 39, pp. 1–10). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.07.006
Fox, M. T., Godage, S. K., Kim, J. M., Bossano, C., Muñoz-Blanco, S., Reinhardt, E., Wu, L., Karais, S., & DeCamp, L. R. (2020). Moving From Knowledge to Action: Improving Safety and Quality of Care for Patients With Limited English Proficiency. Clinical Pediatrics, 59(3), 266–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922819900950
Garone, A., & Van de Craen, P. (2017). The role of language skills and internationalization in nursing degree programmes: A literature review. In Nurse Education Today (Vol. 49, pp. 140–144). Churchill Livingstone. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.012
Giang, N. A. (2025). Challenges and Strategies for English as a Second Language (ESL) Students in Higher Education. Education, Language and Sociology Research, 6(1), p136. https://doi.org/10.22158/elsr.v6n1p136
Ho, T. T. T., & Oh, J. (2022). Development and Evaluation of Cultural Competence Course on Undergraduate Nursing Students in Vietnam. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020888
Huang, Q., Pun, J., & Huang, S. (2022). Using a Mixed-Methods Needs Analysis to Ensure the Sustainability and Success of English for Nursing Communication Courses: Improving Nurse-Patient Engagement Practices in Globalized Health Care. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114077
Hull, M. (2016). Medical language proficiency: A discussion of interprofessional language competencies and potential for patient risk. In International Journal of Nursing Studies (Vol. 54, pp. 158–172). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.02.015
Ishak, S. A., & Abdul Aziz, A. (2022). Role Play to Improve ESL Learners’ Communication Skills: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i10/14851
Jefferies, D., McNally, S., Roberts, K., Wallace, A., Stunden, A., D’Souza, S., & Glew, P. (2018). The importance of academic literacy for undergraduate nursing students and its relationship to future professional clinical practice: A systematic review. In Nurse Education Today (Vol. 60, pp. 84–91). Churchill Livingstone. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.020
Kwame, A., & Petrucka, P. M. (2020). Communication in nurse-patient interaction in healthcare settings in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review. In International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences (Vol. 12). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100198
Kwame, A., & Petrucka, P. M. (2021). A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: barriers, facilitators, and the way forward. In BMC Nursing (Vol. 20, Issue 1). BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2
MacLean, S., Kelly, M., Geddes, F., & Della, P. (2017). Use of simulated patients to develop communication skills in nursing education: An integrative review. In Nurse Education Today (Vol. 48, pp. 90–98). Churchill Livingstone. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.09.018
Maghsoodi, E., Alikhah, H., Ghavipanjeh Rezaiy, S., Partash, N., & Hosseinian, E. (2025). Exploring the impact of role-playing in enhancing nursing education: A systematic review of pedagogical outcomes and student competency development. Nurse Education Today, 152, 106763. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEDT.2025.106763
Massey, D., Johnston, A. N. B., Byrne, J. H., & Osborne, D. M. (2019). The digital age: A scoping review of nursing students’ perceptions of the use of online discussion boards. In Nurse Education Today (Vol. 81, pp. 26–33). Churchill Livingstone. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.06.013
Munangatire, T., & Indjamba, L. (2023). Learning engagement; nursing students’ experiences in an online environment at a university. Nursing Open, 10(5), 3145–3152. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1564
O’Connor, S., & Andrews, T. (2018). Smartphones and mobile applications (apps) in clinical nursing education: A student perspective. Nurse Education Today, 69, 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEDT.2018.07.013
Oliveira, J. (2024). Effective Communication in Healthcare Settings: Building Trust and Improving Patient Outcomes (2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16923834
Osman, R. A. (2025). Energy-efficient communication between IoMT devices and emergency vehicles for improved patient care. PLOS ONE, 20(8 August). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330695
Rahimi, M., Khodabandeh Shahraki, S., Fatehi, F., & Farokhzadian, J. (2023). A virtual training program for improving cultural competence among academic nurse educators. BMC Medical Education, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04414-x
Repsha, C. L., Quinn, B. L., & Peters, A. B. (2020). Implementing a Concept-Based Nursing Curriculum: A Review of the Literature. In Teaching and Learning in Nursing (Vol. 15, Issue 1, pp. 66–71). Elsevier USA. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2019.09.006
Sartain, A. F., Welch, T. D., & Strickland, H. P. (2021). Utilizing Nursing Students for a Complex Role-Play Simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 60, 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECNS.2021.06.009
Shin, D., Lee, Y., Song, E., Kim, J., & Song, R. (2025). Patient‐Centred Communication as a Mediator of Nurses’ Safety‐Care Activities. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.70103
Starkey, T. J. (2015). The critical factors that influence faculty attitudes and perceptions of teaching English as Second Language nursing students: A grounded theory research study. Nurse Education Today, 35(5), 718–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.017
Walter Dick, Lou Carey, & James O. carey. (2005). The Systematic Design of Instruction, Sixth Edition. Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
Yudha, A. A. N., & Mahardika, M. (2014). The Need for Need Analysis in Curriculum Development. Lingua Scientia, 6(2).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 EXPOSURE : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
