EMPOWERING VOICES: DEVELOPING INNOVATIVE PUBLIC SPEAKING MATERIALS FOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/gcfv7a77Keywords:
Public Speaking, Learning Materials, Curriculum, Students, Development ResearchAbstract
The increasing demand for graduates who are able to communicate effectively in English across different professional domains highlights the need for continuous curriculum evaluation and learning material development. This research is related to the learning outcomes of graduates that have been determined in the English Diploma 3 Program curriculum, especially in the special skills points regarding to oral communication skills in the office, tourism and mass media sectors. In the researcher's understanding, the learning outcomes of graduates must be achieved through various efforts; one of which is the preparation of appropriate learning materials for courses related to communication, one of which is Public Speaking. To be able to compile the learning material in question, complete and precise research has been carried out. Based on this, the appropriate research to be carried out is development research because this research puts ideas into practice as an effort to increase knowledge regarding, for example, curriculum and teaching and learning; then the idea was developed to become a standard model. The results obtained from this research are an increase in what happens in the classroom and understanding of the basis of educational practices implemented. This research also presents ideas about learning materials for Public Speaking courses for students in the English Diploma 3 study program. The expected research results are a more complete set of learning plans and textbooks or modules according to the subjects that are the material of this research.
References
Admin. (2025). Understanding the 4D Model in Educational Design and Development. Greenmetric.Uma.Ac.Id. https://greenmetric.uma.ac.id/2024/12/24/understanding-the-4d-model-in-educational-design-and-development/?form=MG0AV3
Alfonsius, A. (2021). Penyelenggaraan Pembelajaran Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Journal of Accounting and Management, 5(1), 1–10.
Anggraini, H., Haryono, S. E., Muntomimah, S., Wijayanti, R., & Akbar, M. R. (2022). Strategi Pengembangan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka Berbasis Individual Differences. Jurnal Ilmiah Potensia, 7(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.33369/jip.7.1.
Arofah, E. F. (2016). Evaluasi Kurikulum Pendidikan. Jurnal Tawadhu, 15(2), 1–23.
Bouchrika, I. (2025). The ADDIE Model Explained: Evolution, Steps, and Applications in 2025. Research.Com. https://research.com/education/the-addie-model?form=MG0AV3
Boy Jon, R., Embong, R., Purnama, B., & Safar Wadi, A. (2021). The Challenges of English Language Teaching in Indonesia. International Journal of English and Applied Linguistics (IJEAL), 1(3), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.47709/ijeal.v1i3.1157
Dolot, A. (2018). New trends in management The Characteristics of Generation Z. E-Mentor, 2(2), 44–50. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=737237
Hanafi. (2017). Konsep Penelitian R&D Dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Saintifika Islamica: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman, 4(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367352035-10
Haq, F. (2023). Problematika Dan Solusi Manajemen Pembelajaran Pai Di Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam. 8(1), 78–91. https://www.ejournal.iainu-kebumen.ac.id/index.php/Ar-rihlah
Hasibuan, S., Rodliyah, I., Thalhah, S. Z., Ratnaningsih, P. W., & E, A. A. M. S. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (M. Hasan (ed.); 1st ed.).
Hastuti, K., Susanti, H., & Erfando, T. (2022). Evaluasi Kebijakan Program MBKM dalam Meningkatkan Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan Perguruan Tinggi. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(6), 7445–7454. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i6.4119
Lim, W. M. (2024). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
Maqbool, S., Ismail, S. A. M. M., & Maqbool, S. (2020). Language learning strategies for gen Z ESL learners as digital natives. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3439–3448. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080818
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2021). Educational design research: Portraying, conducting, and enhancing productive scholarship. Medical Education, 55(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14280
Nur Nasution, W. (2017). Perencanaan Pembelajaran Pengertian, Tujuan Dan Prosedur. Ittihad, I, 185–195.
Penyusun, T. I. M., Radin, J. L., & Ii, I. (n.d.). Dokumen Kurikulum 2023-2024.
Rakhimov, B. K. (2023). Theories Of Students’ Creative Thinking Development Based On Innovative Approach. American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research, No. 09 (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/Volume03Issue09-16
Sanosi, A. (2023). Students’ Agreement with QM® Rubrics as Benchmarks for Online Course Quality. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 21(3), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.3.2954
Setiawati*, I., Wardani, S., & Lestari, W. (2024). Development of Wordwall-based Indonesian Geographical Condition Assessment Instrument in Modipaskogo E-Book for Elementary School Students. Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities, 7(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v7i1.36597
Sopiansyah et. al. (n.d.). 458-Article Text-2952-2-10-20211106.
Ten Cate, O., Chen, H. C., Hoff, R. G., Peters, H., Bok, H., & Van Der Schaaf, M. (2015). Curriculum development for the workplace using Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs): AMEE Guide No. 99. Medical Teacher, 37(11), 983–1002. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1060308
Wismanto, W., Yanti, N., Yapidus, Y., Pranata, H., & Deprizon, D. (2023). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Aqidah untuk Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau. Mitra PGMI: Jurnal Kependidikan MI, 9(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.46963/mpgmi.v9i1.820
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 EXPOSURE : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
