Disputing land: argumentative turn in local land policy conflict in Central Java, Indonesia

Laila Kholid Alfirdaus, Dzunuwwanus Ghulam Manar, Teguh Yuwono

Abstract


This paper discusses the argumentative turn amongst farmers and the other different stakeholders in the case of land disputes, Kebumen, Central Java, Indonesia. While policy makers insisted that the land function conversion from agriculture and tourism to mining was needed to support local development as through the absorption of labors into employment sector, as well as to improve local people’s income, local farmers insisted that the conversion merely uprooting their ownership of land and let them back to periods where they were jobless and lack of source of income decades ago. This paper applied qualitative research supported with observation and interviews with parties involved in the case, to highlight the argumentative turn within land policy, which in the case of Kebumen leads to policy conflict. This paper identifies the elite-driven policy in the land dispute cases in Kebumen has led policy close to discussions with various stakeholders, which are necessary to be heard in the policy making. This finding highlights the idea that policy creates within itself politics that is in-line with the interest of the elites, and yet, resulted in the feedback loop, manifested through the strong resistance of the community. 


Keywords


policy argumentation; political economy; land conflict; decentralization

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adnan, S. (2013) Land grabs and primitive accumulation in deltaic Bangladesh: Interactions between neoliberal globalization, state interventions, power relations and peasant resistance. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 40:1, 87-128, DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2012.753058

Alonso-Fradejas, A. (2012) Land control-grabbing in Guatemala: The political economy of contemporary agrarian change. Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'études du développement, 33:4, 509-528, DOI: 10.1080/02255189.2012.743455

Amundsen, I. 2013. Democratic dynasties? Internal party democracy in Bangladesh. Party Politics 22, no 1, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813511378

Bachriadi, D. & Suryana, E. (2016) Land grabbing and speculation for energy business: a case study of ExxonMobil in East Java, Indonesia. Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'études du développement, 37:4, 578-594, DOI: 10.1080/02255189.2016.1197825

Bakker, L., & Moniaga, S. (2010). The Space Between: Land claims and the law in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Science, 38(2), 187-203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853110X490890

Barber, C. W., and Talbott, K. (2003). The Chainsaw and the Gun: The Role of the military in deforesting Indonesia. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Beckert, B., Dittrich, C., & Adiwibowo, S. (2014). Contested land: an analysis of multi-layered conflicts in Jambi Province, Sumatra, Indonesia. ASEAS - Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 7(1), 75-92. https:// doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-2014.1-6

Besley, Timothy. 2007. The new political economy. The Economic Journal 117, F540–F557.

Boehmer, C. and Sobek, D. 2005. Violent adolescence: State development and the propensity for militarized interstate conflict. Journal of Peace Research 42 (1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343305049664

Boone, C. (2013). Land regimes and the structure of politics: Patterns of land-related conflict. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, 83(1), 188–203.

Boyd, R., Galjart, B. and Ngo, T. (2006). Political Conflict and Development in East Asia and Latin America. New York: Routledge.

Chaudhry, A. and Garner, P. (2007). Do governments suppress growth? Institutions, rent-seeking, and innovation blocking in a model of Schumpeterian growth. Economics and Politics, 19 (1), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2007.00301.x

Colebatch, H. K. (2009). Policy. Maidenhead, England, New York: Open University Press.

Dadashpoor, H. & Ahani, S. (2021) Land conflict management measures in peri-urban areas: a meta-synthesis review, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64:11, 1909-1939, DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2020.1852916

Deutsch, M., Coleman, P. and Marcus, E. (eds.). (2006). The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice, 2nd ed. San Fransisco: John Wiley and Son.

Fischer, F. & Gottweis, H. (2013) The argumentative turn in public policy revisited: twenty years later, Critical Policy Studies, 7(4), 425-433, DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2013.851164

Fischer, F. (2015). Handbook of critical policy studies. Cheltenham: Elgaronline. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783472352

Garfinkel, M. and Skaperda, S. (1996). The Political Economy of Conflict and Appropriation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gasper, D. (1996). Analyzing policy arguments, The European Journal of Development Research, 8:1,36-62, DOI: 10.1080/09578819608426652

Gutierrez, E. and Borras, Jr. S. (2004). The Moro Conflict: Landlessness and Misdirected State Policies. Policy Paper No. 8, 1-89. Washington: East-West Center.

Hall, R. (2004). A Political economy of land reform in South Africa. Review of African Political Economy, 31(100), 213-227, DOI: 10.1080/0305624042000262257

Hall, R., Edelman, M., Borras Jr., S. M., Scoones, I., White, B. & Wolford, W. (2015) Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 42(3-4), 467-488, DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2015.1036746

Hall, R., et. al. (2011) Land grabbing in Southern Africa: the many faces of the investor rush. Review of African Political Economy, 38 (128), 193-214, DOI: 10.1080/03056244.2011.582753

Jessop, B. (2013). The returns of the argumentative turn. Critical Policy Studies, 7(4), 434-439, DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2013.851165

Joshi, S. (2022) Gendered repertoires of contention: women’s resistance, authoritarian state formation, and land grabbing in Cambodia. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 24(2), 198-220, DOI: 10.1080/14616742.2022.2053295

Liddle, R. W. (2013). Improving the quality of democracy in Indonesia: Toward a theory of action. Indonesia, 96, 59–80. https://doi.org/10.5728/indonesia.96.0057

Lucas, A. and Warren. C. (2013). Land for the people: The State and Agrarian Conflict in Indonesia. Boston: Ohio University Press.

Margulis, M. E., McKeon, N. & Borras Jr., S. (2013) Land grabbing and global governance: Critical perspectives. Globalizations, 10 (1), 1-23, DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2013.764151

Marshal, G. and Ozawa, C. (2003). Mediated Negotiation and Democratic Theory: Implications for Practice. In W.J. Pammer, Jr. and J. Killian (Eds.), Handbook of ConfIict Management, 207-219. New York: Marcel Dekker.

McMichael, P. (2013) Land grabbing as security mercantilism in international relations. Globalizations, 10(1), 47-64, DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2013.760925

Mohtadi, H. and Roe, T. L. (2003). Democracy, rent seeking, public spending and growth. Journal of Public Economics, 87(3-4), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00135-9

Muhammad, F. & Pascarina, C. (2017). Relasi Kuasa dalam Perebutan Lahan di Situs Candi Bojongmenje. UMBARA: Indonesian Journal of Anthropology, 2(1), 45-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/umbara.v2i1.15678.

Oliveira, G. de L. T., McKay, B. M., & Liu, J. (2021). Beyond land grabs: new insights on land struggles and global agrarian change. Globalizations, 18(3), 321-338, DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2020.1843842

Omar, I., & Ismail, M. (2009). Kotaka’s model in land acquisition for infrastructure provision in Malaysia. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 14 (3), 194-207. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev000010026.

Pisani, E. (2014). Indonesia in Pieces: The Downside of Decentralization. Foreign Affairs 93(4), 142-152.

Ramadani, F. (2022). Konflik sosial perebutan lahan perkebunan. Paradigma: The Journal of Sociology, 11 (1), 1-34.

Reinikka, R. and Svensson, J. (2004), Local capture: Evidence from a central government transfer program in Uganda. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2), 679–705. doi: 10.1162/0033553041382120

Riggs, R. A., Sayer,, J., Margules, C., Boedhihartono, A. K., Langston, J. D., ,and Sutanto, H. (2016). Forest tenure and conflict in Indonesia: Contested rights in Rempek Village, Lombok. Land Use Policy 57, 241-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.002

Simmons, C. S. (2004). The Political Economy of Land Conflict in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(1), 183–206.

Skjeggedal, T., Flemsaeter, F. & Gundersen, V. (2021). Land use planning in disputed mountain areas: conflicting interests and common arenas. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64:7, 1133-1155, DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2020.1812379

van der Muur, W. (2018) Forest conflicts and the informal nature of realizing indigenous land rights in Indonesia, Citizenship Studies, 22:2, 160-174, DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2018.1445495

Verma, R. (2014) Land Grabs, Power, and Gender in East and Southern Africa: So, What's New? Feminist Economics, 20(1), 52-75, DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2014.897739

Visser, O., Mamonova, N. & Spoor, M. (2012) Oligarchs, megafarms and land reserves: understanding land grabbing in Russia. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3-4), 899-931, DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2012.675574

Warburton, E., & Aspinall, E. (2019). Explaining Indonesia’s Democratic Regression: Structure, Agency and Popular Opinion. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 41(2), 255–285. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26798854

Weible, C. M., Heikkila, T., deLeon, P., & Sabatier, P. A. (2012). Understanding and influencing the policy process. Policy Sciences, 45(1), 1–21.

Weingast, B. and Wittman, D. (eds.). (2006). The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Wolford, W., Borras, Jr., S., Hall, R., Scoones, I., & White, B. (2013). Governing global land deals the role of the state in the rush for land. Wiley Balckwell: West Sussex.

Zambakari, D. C. (2017). Land Grab and Institutional Legacy of Colonialism: The Case of Sudan. Consilience: The Journal of Sustainable Development, 18(2), 193–204.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v13i2.8209

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License

Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 
View My Stats