The Ontology of Government Studies Development: A Systematic Review

Tri Sulistyaningsih, Muhammad Kamil, Umi Kulsum, Eko Priyo Purnomo, Salahudin Salahudin, Ali Roziqin

Abstract


Ontology is the process of discussing knowledge from a philosophical point of view. Therefore, this research aims to explain the nature of government studies based on ontology, which is a governmental science used to carry out periodic paradigm shifts. Data was collected from the Scopus database and reviewed using the systematic method. The results showed that government studies are associated with the management of the executive and legislative branches, their leadership, and the relationship between central and local government and between government and society. The study of government science progress is in three phases; the first determines the essence of science in governance and ends with the third phase, which is the development of the concept of good governance. The governance concept is considered a solution to the crisis of lack of public trust in the government and their participation, effectiveness, accountability, and coherence in community activities. This becomes the wheels of government by mono and multi-stakeholder. Collaborative correlation is the initiation by the government to involve the public and the private sector.


Keywords


Ontology; Government Studies; Governance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbar, I. (2017). PILKADA SERENTAK DAN GELIAT DINAMIKA POLITIK DAN PEMERINTAHAN LOKAL INDONESIA. CosmoGov, 2(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v2i1.11852

Albarghothi, A., Saber, W., & Shaalan, K. (2018). Automatic Construction of E-Government Services Ontology from Arabic Webpages. Procedia Computer Science, 142, 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.465

Amailef, K., & Lu, J. (2013). Ontology-supported case-based reasoning approach for intelligent m-Government emergency response services. Decision Support Systems, 55(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.034

Bekke, H. A. G. M., Kickert, W. J. M., & Kooiman, J. (1995). Public Management and Governance. In Public policy and administrative sciences in the Netherlands. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.

Boyer, W. W. (1990). Political Science and the 21st Century: From Government to Governance. PS: Political Science and Politics, 23(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.2307/419778

Brusa, G., Laura Caliusco, M., & Chiotti, O. (2008). Towards ontological engineering: a process for building a domain ontology from scratch in public administration. Expert Systems, 25(5), 484–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0394.2008.00471.x

Carusi, F. T., Rawlins, P., & Ashton, K. (2018). The ontological politics of evidence and policy enablement. Journal of Education Policy, 33(3), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1376118

Crawford, L., Costello, K., Pollack, J., & Bentley, L. (2003). Managing soft change projects in the public sector. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 443–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00099-6

Crawford, L. H., & Helm, J. (2009). Government and Governance: The Value of Project Management in the Public Sector. Project Management Journal, 40(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20107

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. California: SAGE Publications.

de Jong, M. D. T., Neulen, S., & Jansma, S. R. (2019). Citizens’ intentions to participate in governmental co-creation initiatives: Comparing three co-creation configurations. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 490–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.04.003

Denney, A. S., & Tewksbury, R. (2013). How to Write a Literature Review. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 24(2), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2012.730617

Edwards-Jones, A. (2014). Qualitative data analysis with NVIVO. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(2), 193–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2013.866724

Eko Yunanto, S. (2020). ILMU PEMERINTAHAN: ANTI PADA POLITIK, LUPA PADA HUKUM, DAN ENGGAN PADA ADMINISTRASI. GOVERNABILITAS (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Semesta), 1(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.47431/governabilitas.v1i1.77

Heffy, M. (2009). Reformasi Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Menuju Good Governance. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 5(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v5i2.44

Jackson, K., & Bazeley, P. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. New York: SAGE.

Karniawati, N. (2017). HAKEKAT ILMU PEMERINTAHAN (Kajian Secara Filsafat). CosmoGov, 1(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v1i2.11833

Kooiman, J. (1993). Social-Political Governance: Introduction. In Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. California: SAGE.

Krause, S. (2000). The Spirit of Separate Powers in Montesquieu. The Review of Politics, 62(2), 231–265. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500029454

Lacina, K. (2011). Remarks to the Development of Public Administration from the Concept of “Government” to the Concept of “Governance.” Acta Všfs University of Finance and Administration, 5(2), 126–147.

Lippmann, W. (1955). Essays in the public philosophy. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

Little, D. (2020). A New Social Ontology of Government. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48923-6

Maclver, R. M. (1963). The Web of Government. New York: The Macmillan Company.

Marlow, J. (2002). Governmentality, ontological security and ideational stability: Preliminary observations on the manner, ritual and logic of a particular art of government. Journal of Political Ideologies, 7(2), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310220137566

Massey, A. (2007). Multilevel Governance: Administering Global Governance in a Differentiated Political Context. In The World We Could Win: Administering Global Governance. Czech Republic: Prague: Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic (pp. 3–17). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

Ndraha, T. (2011). Ilmu Pemerintahan Baru. Jakarta: PT Rineka Citra.

Nisar, M. A. (2017). Practitioner Envy and Construction of the Other in Public Administration. Administration & Society, 49(10), 1403–1423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715581038

Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance Without Government? Rethinking Public Administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024379

Rhodes, R. A. (1997). Understanding Governance - Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham - Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Salahudin, S., Nurmandi, A., & Loilatu, M. J. (2020). How to Design Qualitative Research with NVivo 12 Plus for Local Government Corruption Issues in Indonesia? Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 11(3), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.113124

Schmidt, V., & Wood, M. (2019). Conceptualizing throughput legitimacy: Procedural mechanisms of accountability, transparency, inclusiveness and openness in EU governance. Public Administration, 97(4), 727–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12615

Scott, W. R., & Davis, G. F. (2015). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural and open systems perspectives. New York: Routledge.

Smith, B. (2012). Ontology. In The furniture of the world (pp. 47–68). Leiden: BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207799_005

Soewargono, S. (1993). State of The Art dari Ilmu Pemerintahan. Jakarta: Karya Dharma-IIP.

Sourouni, A.-M., Kourlimpinis, G., Mouzakitis, S., & Askounis, D. (2010). Towards the government transformation: An ontology-based government knowledge repository. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 32(1–2), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2009.06.002

Syafiie, I. K., Rasjidi, L., & Gunarsa, A. (2001). Pengantar Ilmu Pemerintahan. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Syafiie, I. K. (2005). Pengantar Ilmu Pemerintahan. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Tapscott, D., Williams, A. D., & Herman, D. (2008, January). Government 2.0: Transforming government and governance for the twenty-first century. New Paradigm, 1–25.

Votis, K., Alexakos, C., Vassiliadis, B., & Likothanassis, S. (2008). An ontologically principled service-oriented architecture for managing distributed e-government nodes. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 31(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2006.03.006

Wang, H., Zhang, W., Deng, S., & Zhang, B. (2020). An ontology automation construction scheme for Chinese e‐government thesaurus optimizing. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.243

Wijnhoven, F., Ehrenhard, M., & Kuhn, J. (2015). Open government objectives and participation motivations. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.10.002

Yang, K., & Callahan, K. (2007). Citizen Involvement Efforts and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Participatory Values, Stakeholder Pressures, and Administrative Practicality. Public Administration Review, 67(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00711.x

Yang, K., & Pandey, S. K. (2011). Further Dissecting the Black Box of Citizen Participation: When Does Citizen Involvement Lead to Good Outcomes? Public Administration Review, 71(6), 880–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02417.x

Ylst, F. Van. (2017). EKSISTENSI ILMU PEMERINTAHAN. CosmoGov, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v1i1.11856




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v12i1.6199

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Creative Commons License

Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 
View My Stats