Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Towards the Collaborative Governance in Maintaining Indigenous History of Pejangki Village in Indragiri Hulu, Indonesia
Abstract
Pejangki Village is one of the villages that has managed to maintain its long-standing indigenous history. The argument from this study is that success in preserving indigenous history is the result of a multi-actor collaboration process within it. Therefore, this study seeks to explore collaboration among actors in maintaining indigenous history in Pejangki Village, Batang Cenaku District, Indragiri Hulu Regency, Riau Province. This study uses a qualitative approach with a focus on analyzing collaboration between state and non-state actors in the context of maintaining indigenous history in Pejangki Village. The data obtained were sourced from interviews and secondary data which included report results, journals, documents, and minutes of meetings. The results of this study indicate that collaboration among these actors can be successful because of the initial conditions that support collaboration, institutional design, multi-stakeholder participation and engagement, and facilitative leadership. The conclusion is that the policy of maintaining indigenous history in Pejangki Village is the result of the practice of collaborative governance carried out by state and non-state actors.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abubakar, L. (2013). Revitalisasi Hukum Adat sebagai Sumber Hukum dalam Membangun Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 13(2).
Alting, H. (2011). Penguasaan Tanah Masyarakat Hukum Adat (Suatu Kajian terhadap Masyarakat Hukum Adat Ternate). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 11(1).
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(4), 543-571.
Chhotray, V., & Stoker, G. (2009). Governance theory and practice: A cross-disciplinary approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Creswell, John W.(2014). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches 4th ed. Los Angeles, London. New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: SAGE Publications
Davidson, J., & Henley, D. (Eds.). (2007). The revival of tradition in Indonesian politics: The deployment of adat from colonialism to indigenism. London: Routledge.
Denhardt, J.V., &. Denhardt, R.B. (2007). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Dewi, A.R. (Ed). (2017). Persoalan Agraria Kontemporer: Teknologi, Pemetaan, Penilaian Tanah, dan Konflik. Yogyakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (PPPM) dan STPN Press.
Donahue, J. D., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2011). Collaborative governance: Private roles for public goals in turbulent times. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Duncan, C. R. (2009). Reconciliation and revitalization: the resurgence of tradition in postconflict Tobelo, North Maluku, Eastern Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Studies, 68(4), 1077-1104.
Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T,. & Balogh, S. (2011) An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1-29.
Hadiwijoyo, S.S. (2012). Negara, Demokrasi, dan Civil Society. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Hamidy, UU. (2014). Jagad Melayu dalam Lintasan Budaya di Riau. Pekanbaru: Bilik Kreatif Press.
Innes, J.E. & Booher, D.E. (2000) Collaborative Dialogue as a Policy Making Strategy. Institute of Urban and Regional Development University of California, Berkeley. IURDWorking Paper.
Irianto, S. (2004). Competition and Interaction between Stae Law and Customary Law in the Court Room: a study of inheritance cases in Indonesiat. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 36(05).
Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2018). Status Hutan & Kehutanan Indonesia 2018. Jakarta: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan.
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. California: SAGE.
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Delhi: New Age International.
McWilliam, A. (2006). Historical reflections on customary land rights in Indonesia. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 7(1), 45-64.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A method sourcebook. CA, US: Sage Publications.
Mutolib, A., Yonariza, Y., Mahdi, M., & Ismono, H. (2015). Konflik agraria dan pelepasan tanah ulayat (Studi kasus pada masyarakat suku melayu di Kesatuan Pemangkuan Hutan Dharmasraya, Sumatera Barat). Jurnal penelitian sosial dan ekonomi kehutanan, 12(3).
Rachman, N. F. (2014). Masyarakat Hukum Adat Adalah Bukan Penyandang Hak, Bukan Subjek Hukum, dan Bukan Pemilik Wilayah Adatnya. Wacana, 33, 25-50.
Suharko, S. (2016). Masyarakat Adat versus Korporasi: Konflik Sosial Rencana Pembangunan Pabrik Semen di Kabupaten Pati Jawa Tengah Periode 2013-2016. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 20(2).
Svara, J. H. (Ed.). (2009). The facilitative leader in city hall: Reexamining the scope and contributions. Florida: CRC Press.
Tyson, A. (2011). Being special, becoming indigenous: Dilemmas of special adat rights in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Science, 39(1).
von Benda-Beckmann, F., & von Benda-Beckmann, K. (2011). Myths and stereotypes about adat law: A reassessment of Van Vollenhoven in the light of current struggles over adat law in Indonesia. Bijdragen tot de taal-, land-en volkenkunde/Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 167(2-3), 167-195.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v11i1.3002
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
