Actor Participation of Budgeting Policy Process in Banten, Indonesia

Delly Maulana, Endang Larasati, Sri Suwitri, Kismartini Kismartini


In actualizing the Regional Government Budget (APBD) as an instrument for the desired social changes and in accordance to the purpose for decentralization, there needs to be the involvement of the civil society, community groups, and other stakeholders in public management to influence the policy formulation process and policy implementation which could improve public services and public accountability. The purpose of the current study was to describe the process of formulating the budgeting policy and identifying and plotting the participation of a number of actors, both formal actors and informal actors, in the process of formulating the budgeting policy in the Banten Province Regional Government. The research method employed was a qualitative research method using the NVivo 12 Pro software application. A number of the current study’s findings which were related to the budgeting process were clearly linked to the actors’ political relation which would give rise to demands and requests in the form of actvity proposals. This process would also give rise to various compromises and bargaining between the actors involved, including the value system which influences it. Moreover, the process of formulating the budgeting policy in Banten Province Regional Government in 2018, both in planning and budgeting, were done only as a procedure but not yet substantively. Therefore, budgeting policy formulation process needs to prioritize more widespread public participation, especially in discussions and collecting input or information for the government, both directly or indirectly so that a transparent and accountable process is created


Policy formulation; Actor; Participatory Budgeting; Transparency; Accountability

Full Text:



Alex B. Brillantes, J., & Jose Tiu Sonco II. (2005). Participatory Planning and Budgeting at the Sub-national Level. New York: United Nations.

Anderson, J. E. (2003). Public Policy Making. Boston New York: Houghton Miffin Company.

Avriel, M., Arad, N., Kami, R., & Breiner, A. (1983). A Rational Decision Making Process for Resource Policy Making. IFAC. Dynamic Modeling and Control of National Economics, 19.

Brian Wampler. (2007). Participatory Budgeting. In Anwar Shah (Ed.). Washington, DC.

Bryson, J. M., Quinn, M., & Bowman, R. A. (2011). Working With Evaluation Stakeholders : A Rationale , Step-Wise Approach and Toolkit. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(1), 1–12.

Dunn. (2014). Public Policy Analysis Dunn Fifth Edition. Retrieved from

Giuriato, L. (2016). Fiscal Forecasts and Political Systems : A Legislative Budgeting Perspective. Public Choice, 168(1), 1–22.

Hermans, L. M., & Thissen, W. (2009). Actor Analysis Methods and Their Use for Public Policy Analysts, (November 2016).

Lee, H., Al-yafi, K., & Weerakkody, V. (2014). Supporting Public Policy Making Processes with Workflow Technology : Lessons Learned From Cases in Four European Countries, 8 (July 2012).

Lee, S. K. (2017). Policy Formulation and Implementation on Participatory Budgeting in Seoul, South Korea, Policy and Governance Review 1(2), 125–137.

Ibrahim, & Proctor, R. A. (1992). Incremental Budgeting in Local Authorities. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 5(5), 11.

Madlen Serban. (2015). Supporting Public Policy Making Through Policy Analysis And. Torino.

Mara S. Sidney. (2007). Handbook of Public Policy Analysis. In F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.). Broken Sound Parkway NW: CRC Press. Retrieved from

Maulana, D. (2018). Budget Policy Innovation Through Participatory Budgeting In The Provincial Government of Banten. Jurnal Ilmu Administasri Negara STIA Lan Bandung, XV(1), 97–102.

Melgar, T. R. (2014). A Time of Closure ? Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre , Brazil , after the Workers ’ Party Era. J. Lat. Amer.Studi Cambridge Press, (46), 121–146.

Nak-ai, W., Jiawiwatkul, U., & Temsirikulchia, L. (2018). Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences Community Public Policy Process for Solving Cadmium Contamination Problems in the Environment : A Case Study of Mae Sod District, Tak province. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(1), 59–66.

Oliver, S. (1986). Public Policy-Making in Developing Countries : The Utility of Contemporary Decision-Making Mode.

Ondee, P., & Pannarunothai, S. (2008). Stakeholder Analysis : Who are the Key Actors in Establishing and Developing Thai Independent Consumer Organizations ?, 265–275.

Osman, F. A. (2014). Public Policy Making : Theories And Their Implications In Public Policy Making : Theories, (January 2002).

Piper, L. (2019). How Participatory Institutions Deepen Democracy through Broadening Representation: The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre, Brazil Laurence Piper. Theoria A Journal of Social and Political Theory, Volume 66 (Social and Political Theory, Literature, Philosophy, History), 50–67.

Popoola, O. O. (2016). Actors in Decision Making and Policy Process, 5(1), 47–51.

Pratiwi, R. N. (2010). Politisasi Anggaran Sektor Publik. Jurnal Interkatif Universitas Brawijaya, 1, 2. Retrieved from

Richard, W. (1986). Planning and budgeting in Pakistan : SUMMARY.

Rijal, F., Madani, M., & Fatmawati, F. (2013). Interaksi Aktor dalam Perumusan Kebijakan Pengelolaan Pertambangan di Kabupaten Kolaka Utara. Otoritas Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 3(2), 14–26.

Sedmihradská, L. (2015). Budget Transparency in Czech Local Government. Procedia Economics and Finance, 25(May), 598–606.

Silke Adam, & Kries, H. (2007). Theories of the Policy Process. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.) (pp. 134–135). Colorado: Westview Press.

Smith, R. (2015). Electronic Citizen Participation in Local Government Decision Making ; Applications for Public Budgeting. In Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on e Government 2015 (pp. 274–283).

Sonia Goncalves. (2013). The Effects of Participatory Budgeting on Municipal Expenditures and Infant Mortality in Brazil. World Development, xx, 1–17.

Souza, C., Batley, R., & Melo, M. (2001). Participatory budgeting in Brazilian cities : limits and possibilities in building democratic institutions, 13(1), 159–184.

Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178.

Vincent, S. (2010). Participatory budgeting in Peru : Democratization , state control , or community autonomy ?, 56, 65–77.

Wampler, B. (2007). Can Participatory Institutions Promote Pluralism ? Mobilizing, 41(4), 57–78.

Widiyanto, & Kariadi, S. (2011). Laporan Final Penelitian Representasi Popular dalam Penganggaran Partisipatif 1. Retrieved from



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Creative Commons License

Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats