Dynamics of education policy formulation after the 18th amendment in Province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26618/705t2662

Keywords:

constitutional amendment, education policy formulation, stakeholders consultation

Abstract

The 18th Amendment to the Constitution of Pakistan has authorized provinces, including Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), to formulated autonomous education policies. This authority includes determining the direction and strategy of the education system for future goals such as literacy rates, gender equality, and quality education. However, after 14 years of implementing this decentralization, KPK's progress in educational policy autonomy has been inadequate. This study evaluates the performance of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province in formulating its own educational policies in the context of the post-18th Constitutional Amendment era. This research is based on semi-structured interviews conducted with key stakeholders in the province. The study also found that as a small province, KPK faces various challenges, such as a shortage of experts in education policy formulation, limited financial and human resources, political interference, an unbalanced federal system, and a lack of extensive consultation with stakeholders. These variables act as barriers to the province's progress in all aspects of formal education, despite the decentralization of school education through the 18th Amendment in 2010. This study recommends the need to enhance the institutional capacity of the KPK Province in formulating education policies in accordance with the objectives of the 18th Amendment.

 

References

Adams, D. K. (2002). Education and national development: priorities, policies, and planning. Vol. 1. Manila Philippine: Asian Development Bank.

Ali, F. (2022). “Post 18th amendment scenario and higher education in pakistan: a case study of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.” Doctoral Dissertation, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad.

Arnove, R. F. (2019). “Neoliberal education policies in latin america: arguments in favor and against.” Pp. 79–100 in Latin American Education, edited by C. A. Torres and A. Puiggrós. Routledge.

Ashraf, M. A., Turner, D. A., & Laar, R. A. (2021). “Multilingual language practices in education in pakistan: the conflict between policy and practice.” Sage Open 11(1):21582440211004140. doi: 10.1177/21582440211004140.

Baber, M. Z. U., & Wazir, S. (2023). “Governance situation in khyber pakhtunkhwa and fulfilment of sdgs: a critical analysis and way forward.” 2(2).

Bijlsma, R. M., Bots, P. W. G., Wolters, H. A., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2011). “An empirical analysis of stakeholders; influence on policy development: The role of uncertainty handling.” Ecology and Society 16(1):art51. doi: 10.5751/ES-03865-160151.

Channa, A. (2016). “Assuring quality education and learning: lessons from education for all - UNESCO Digital Library.” PROSPECTS 46(1):131–47.

Elazar, D. J. (1987). Exploring federalism. University of Alabama Press.

Hafeez, A., Iqbal, S., Imran, M., & Bhutto, S. Z. A. (2024). “Impact of devolution of power on school education performance in Sindh after 18th Constitutional Amendment.” Journal of Development and Social Sciences 2:2709–6254.

Hanson, M. (1997). “Educational decentralization: Issues and challenges.”

Henry, M., Lingard, B., Rizvi, F., & Taylor, S. (2013). Educational policy and the politics of change. 1st ed. London & New York: Routledge.

Jamal, H. (2021). “Educational status of Pakistan: Pre and post 18th Amendment scenario.” Retrieved May 20, 2025 (https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/106274/).

Kettl, D. F. (2015). The transformation of governance: public administration for the twenty-first century. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Khan, S., Khan, M. H., & Gul, D.-N. (2020). “Comparative analysis of education policy reforms of Khyber Pakhtunkhuwa (KP) Pakistan since 2008-18.” Review of Education, Administration & Law 3(2):165–73. doi: 10.47067/real.v3i2.50.

Lakhan, C. (2024). “Best practices in sustainable communication for minority communities.” SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4946143.

McGinn, N., & Welsh, T. (1999). Decentralization of education: why, when, what and how? - UNESCO Digital Library. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Morgan, C. (2016). “Tracing the Sub-national effect of the oecd pisa: integration into Canada’s decentralized education system.” Global Social Policy 16(1):47–67. doi: 10.1177/1468018115571420.

Mustafa, G. (2012). Education policy analysis report of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Pakistan: UNESCO.

Naidoo, J. P. (2005). Educational decentralization and school governance in South Africa: From policy to practice. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning, 2005.

Naz, F., Shah, M. H., & Majoka, M. I. (2021). “Objectives of primary education in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa: perceptions of teachers and head teachers.” Research Journal of Social Sciences and Economics Review 2(2):68–75. doi: 10.36902/rjsser-vol2-iss2-2021(68-75).

Parvez, N., Rauf, A., & Faiz, J. (2021). “Theory and practice of federalism after 18th Amendment: A case study of education sector governance in KP.” The Discourse 7(1):99–112.

Pont, B., & Viennet, R. (2017). Education policy implementation: a literature review and proposed framework. Vol. 162. OECD Education Working Papers. 162. doi: 10.1787/fc467a64-en.

Radó, P. (2001). Transition in education transition in education policy making and the key educational policy areas in the Central-European and Baltic countries. Hungary: Institute for Educational Policy 2001.

Riker, W. H. (1964). Federalism: Origin, operation, significance. Little, Brown and Company.

Sanderson, I. (2002). “Evaluation, policy learning and evidence‐based policy making.” Public Administration, 80(1):1–22. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00292.

Shah, A. (2012). Making federalism work: The 18th Constitutional Amendment. PK 03/12. Washington, D.C: The World Bank.

Shaheen, I. (2013). “Education in Pakistan: A case study of hurdles and proposals for improvement of education sector in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.” Educational Research International Journal, 2(3).

Shaukat, J., Alam, I., & Sanaullah (2021). Public perception towards PTI government in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa: An analysis of the education sector. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 3(2), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.52567/pjsr.v3i02.214.

Siddiqui, S. (2010, October 11). 18th amendment and education.” DAWN, October 11.

Smoke, P. (2015). Rethinking decentralization: Assessing challenges to a popular public sector reform. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 97– 112.

Yaro, I., Arshad, R., & Salleh, D. (2017). “Relevance of stakeholders in policy implementation.” Journal of Public Management Research, 3(1):1. doi: 10.5296/jpmr.v3i1.10632.

Zardari, A., & Zardari, H. A. (2023). “Entrepreneurship and management perspectives on the devolution of powers after the 18th amendment in the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973 : Issues and challenges confronted by cultural heritage.” International Research Journal of Management and Social Science,. 4(1):53–79. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10116125.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-19