Integrating environmental issues in the policy agenda by the ruling parties in East Java, Indonesia
Abstract
This research explores how green ideologies are embedded in the policy agendas of ruling parties, including the three main political parties that won the 2020 local head elections in East Java Province, Indonesia. The research approach used is mixed methods, with quantitative and qualitative analysis to understand the awareness, discourse, and strategy of environmental issues in the policy agenda of the winning political parties. The results show that within political parties, sustainability considerations are largely reactive, oriented towards short-term goals, and mainly used for instrumental purposes. Despite the existing literature, parties that are more likely to survive electorally are in areas where voters are highly concerned about environmental issues and have different party strategies in terms of general policy. However, in East Java province, the increasing public concern for environmental issues has not been used as a strategic tool by political parties. These findings suggest that moving beyond superficial environmental initiatives towards strategic environmental integration can improve electoral competitiveness and promote sustainable development. The results suggest that by aligning their strategies with broader sustainability goals and adopting proactive measures for environmental management, regional political parties in East Java can not only respond to short-term electoral pressures; they can even begin to resolve some of the key sustainability challenges that underpin future electoral success and the quality of governance in their regions.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alim, S. (2024). Komunikasi Lingkungan: Konsep Kunci dan Studi Kasus Terkini di Asia dan Indonesia. Universitas Brawijaya Press.
Alvarez, R. M. (2023). Issue Responsiveness in Canadian Politics: Are Parties Responsive to the Public Salience of Environmental in the Question Period? Political Research Quarterly, 77(1), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129231194270
Álvarez, R., & Morrier, J. (2023). Issue Responsiveness in Canadian Politics: Are Political Parties Responsive to Environmental’s Public Salience in the Question Period?. Comparative Politics, https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2022-xxtxk-v2
Bailey, I., & Compston, H. (2010). Geography and the Politics of Climate Policy. Geography Compass, 4(8), 1097–1114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00366.x
Barros, A. T. d. (2017). The Internet as Environmental Media: Strategies of Brazilian Political Parties. Ambiente & Sociedade, 20(1), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc20150101r1v2012017
Basheer, M., Nechifor, V., Calzadilla, A., Ringler, C., Hulme, D., & Harou, J. J. (2022). Balancing National Economic Policy Outcomes for Sustainable Development. Nature Communications, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32415-9
Carter, N. (2015). Green Parties. Elsevier, 379–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.93049-6
Carter, N., Ladrech, R., Little, C., & Tsagkroni, V. (2017). Political Parties and Climate Policy. Party Politics, 24(6), 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817697630
Clements, B. (2014). Political Party Supporters’ Attitudes Towards and Involvement With Green Issues in Britain. Politics, 34(4), 362–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12046
Crowley, C., & Tighe, M. (2017). Where Greens Support Conservatives: Lessons From the Rundle Minority Government in Tasmania 1996–98. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 63(4), 572–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12404
Dasandi, N., Graham, H., Hudson, D., Mikhaylov, S., vanHeerde‐Hudson, J., & Watts, N. (2022). Positive, Global, and Health or Environment Framing Bolsters Public Support for Climate Policies. Communications Earth & Environment, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00571-x
Durant, T. C., Weintraub, M., Houser, D., & Li, S. (2018). Trust in the Executive. Journal of Peace Research, 55(5), 609–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343318765918
Flores‐Rivera, C., Bedia, A. M. S., & García‐Piqueres, G. (2023). Motivations and Outcomes of Environmental Corporate Sustainability in Family and Non‐family Mexican Firms: The Mediating Role of Eco‐innovation Strategy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(1), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2574
Folke, O. (2014). Shades of Brown and Green: Party Effects in Proportional Election Systems. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(5), 1361–1395. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12103
Fowler, L. (2022). Searching for Green Elephants and Other Mythical Creatures During the Trump Years: Partisanship and Congressional Voting on Environmental Legislation. Politics & Policy, 50(5), 913–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12499
Grant, Z. P., & Tilley, J. (2018). Fertile Soil: Explaining Variation in the Success of Green Parties. West European Politics, 42(3), 495–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1521673
Hu, S. (2024). Religious Ideology and Clientelist Linkage in the Middle East and North Africa. Religions, 15(3), 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030326
Kwidziński, E. (2020). German Green Party: The Evolution of Political Agenda. Journal of Geography Politics and Society, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.26881/jpgs.2020.2.06
Magarey, R. D., Klammer, S., Chappell, T. M., Trexler, C. M., Pallipparambil, G. R., & Hain, E. F. (2019). Eco‐efficiency as a Strategy for Optimizing the Sustainability of Pest Management. Pest Management Science, 75(12), 3129–3134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5560
Meguid, B. M. (2005). Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055405051701
Milfont, T. L., Davies, C. L., & Wilson, M. (2019). The Moral Foundations of Environmentalism: Care- And Fairness-Based Morality Interact With Political Liberalism to Predict Pro-Environmental Actions. Social Psychological Bulletin, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.v14i2.32633
Morton, T. (2018). Environmental Policy Implementation and Citizens’ Willingness to Pay Within a Federal System. Public Policy and Administration Review, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.15640/ppar.v6n2a1
Ostermann, F., & Wagner, W. (2023). Introducing the Parliamentary Deployment Votes Database. Journal of Peace Research, 61(2), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433221116655
Pangestu, O. P., Nurjaman, A., & Kamil, M. (2022). Supervision Function of the Regional House of Representatives Against the Handling of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Jppuma Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Sosial Politik Universitas Medan Area, 10(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.31289/jppuma.v10i1.6375
Russell, C., Lawrence, M., Cullerton, K., & Baker, P. (2020). The Political Construction of Public Health Nutrition Problems: A Framing Analysis of Parliamentary Debates on Junk-Food Marketing to Children in Australia. Public Health Nutrition, 23(11), 2041–2052. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980019003628
Schwörer, J. (2023). Mainstream Parties and Global Warming: What Determines Parties’ Engagement in Climate Protection? European Journal of Political Research, 63(1), 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12602
Sohlberg, J. (2016). The Effect of Elite Polarization: A Comparative Perspective on How Party Elites Influence Attitudes and Behavior on Environmental in the European Union. Sustainability, 9(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010039
Spoon, J. J., Hobolt, S. B., & Vries, C. E. D. (2013). Going Green: Explaining Issue Competition on the Environment. European Journal of Political Research, 53(2), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12032
Stahlke, T. (2023). Climate Policy and the Concept of Co-Benefits in India. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 25(1), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-023-00235-2
Stoddart, M. C. J., & Yang, Y. (2022). What Are the Roles of Regional and Local Climate Governance Discourse and Actors? Mediated Environmental Policy Networks in Atlantic Canada. Review of Policy Research, 40(6), 1144–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12510
Sutrisno, S. (2023). Analysis of Leading Sectors in Improving the Economy East Java Province in 2016-2020. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research, 4(1), 305–311. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.01.29
Taufik, M. (2023). Collaborative Government in Tourism Sector Development. Kne Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i17.14148
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v14i3.16337
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.