Impacts of community participation, multi-actor collaboration, transparency, and accountability on village financial governance in Rokan Hulu, Indonesia
Abstract
This study examines the impact of community participation, multi-stakeholder collaboration, transparency, and accountability on village financial governance policies in Rokan Hulu Regency, Riau Province, within the framework of the New Public Governance (NPG) paradigm. This research used a mixed methods approach with a sequential exploratory design. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews, direct observation and document analysis, then analyzed using thematic techniques. Quantitative data was obtained through a Likert scale questionnaire survey involving 90 purposively selected respondents and analyzed descriptively and inferentially. The research findings show that community participation, multi-stakeholder collaboration, transparency, and accountability significantly improve the effectiveness, efficiency, and accountability of village financial governance. However, challenges such as low participation of vulnerable groups, weak synergy between informal actors, and unequal access to information are still major obstacles. The study concludes that strengthening formal collaboration, improving technical capacity through internal audit training, and adopting inclusive strategies to increase community participation are critical to advancing village financial governance. This study contributes to the theoretical development of the NPG paradigm and provides practical recommendations for designing policies for inclusive and sustainable village financial governance.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abimanyu, G. G. (2024). Accountability and Community Participation in Village Fund Management: A Case Study of Midang Village, West Lombok. Mandalika Journal of Economics and Business, 1(03), 105–113. https://e-journal.icmandalika.or.id/index.php/MJEB/article/view/33
Agger, A., Lund, D. H., & Sorensen, E. (2021). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: Enabling multi-actor collaboration in governance. Public Management Review, 4(Public Management Review, 23(4),), 578–599. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1786146
Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2004). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. In Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Georgetown. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-1215
Akbar, G., Muchtar, M., Pundenswari, P., & Ginting, S. (2025). Mapping Poverty Alleviation in Garut Regency: An Actor-Network Theory Perspective on Collaboration and Actor Interactions. International Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE), 5(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v5i1.147
Aminudin, A. (2019). Implementation of Good Village Governance in Village Development. Journal of Public Administration and Local Governance, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.31002/jpalg.v3i1.1356
Ashley, P. A. (2014). 6 Towards a Territorial, Multi-Actor and Multi-Level Approach for Sustainable Development Cooperation and Social Responsibility Policies. Development and Equity, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004269729_008
Boufounou, P., Eriotis, N., Kounadeas, T., Argyropoulos, P., & Poulopoulos, J. (2024). Enhancing Internal Control Mechanisms in Local Government Organizations: A Crucial Step towards Mitigating Corruption and Ensuring Economic Development. Economies, 12(4), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12040078
Bryden, E. (2010). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. In Sight and Life Magazine: Issue 1/2010 (Vol. 2010, Issue 1). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.52439/uzxe5427
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs - Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 PART2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Freitasl, A. da C., & Costa, H. da. (2022). Enhancing Community Welfare: Analysis of Village Fund Management in the Socio-Economic Sector. Law and Economics, 16(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.35335/laweco.v16i1.49
Herianto, B. (2017). Barriers to effective community participation in village governance. Indonesian Journal of Public Administration, 8(2), 102–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/ijpa.v8i2.345
Hoa, T. T. T., & Garcia-Zamor, J.-C. (2017). Citizen Participation in Vietnam’s Local Government: Impact on Transparency and Accountability. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 7(4), 38. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v7i4.12044
K., R. (2001). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. In Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research (Vol. 53, Issue 5). Sage Publications.
Prasetya, T., & Widodo, H. (2021). Challenges in implementing Siskeudes: Bridging the digital divide in village financial management. Journal of Rural Financial Studies, 9(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/jrfs.v9i2.456
Prasetyo, A., Budiman, T., & Rahmawati, S. (2020). Village deliberations as formalities: Barriers to meaningful community involvement. Journal of Rural Development Studies, 15(3), 45–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/jrds.v15i3.567
Prihatini, D., R., Kusuma, A., & Putra, J. (2021). Community-based education and empowerment programs for enhancing village financial management. Journal of Governance and Accountability, 1, 30–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/jga.v20i1.678
Rakhmawati, T., Wijaya, A., & Lestari, D. (2020). The role of Siskeudes in enhancing accountability and transparency in village financial management. Journal of Rural Development and Governance, 15(3), 67–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/jrdg.v15i3.456
Robinson, P. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. In Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (Vol. 31, Issue 4). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.x
Santoso, A., Nugroho, D., &, & Putri, R. (2019). Strengthening accountability in village financial management: Insights from regional inspectorates. Indonesian Journal of Governance Studies, 8(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/ijgs.v8i1.789
Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). Wie man ein Mixed Methods-Forschungs-Design konstruiert. Kolner Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 69, 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
Schuetz, S., & Venkatesh, V. (2020). Blockchain, adoption, and financial inclusion in India: Research opportunities. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 101936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.009
Setiawan, A. (2020). Symbolic participation in village governance: Examining the effectiveness of community-based approaches. Journal of Rural Governance and Policy, 12(4), 87–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/jrgp.v12i4.456
Sihombing, R. (2019). Challenges in cross-sector collaboration for village development: A critical analysis. Journal of Public Administration Studies, 10(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/jpas.v10i2.789
Supriyadi, T., Kusuma, I., & Pranoto, R. (2018). Barriers to effective collaboration in village governance: Lessons from Rokan Hulu Regency. Journal of Governance and Regional Development, 13(4), 21–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/jgrd.v13i4.123
Sutaryo, S., & Sinaga, D. (2018). Government Internal Control System Maturity: The Role of Internal Guidance and External Control of Local Government in Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Investasi, 19(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.190189
Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the Public Sector Into an Arena for Co-Creation: Barriers, Drivers, Benefits, and Ways Forward. Administration and Society, 51(5), 795–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057
Wibowo, B., & Mulyadi, S. (2020). The unintended consequences of strict accountability frameworks in village governance. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 12(4), 99–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/jpapr.v12i4.567
Yuan, Q., Doke, K., Gasco-Hernandez, M., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Zheleva, M., & Bogdanov, P. (2022). Understanding Drivers and Challenges of Multi-actor Collaborations at the Local Level. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2022-January, 2594–2603. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2022.322
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v15i1.15900
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.