Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Navigating political terrain: a comprehensive review of leadership theories in political science
Abstract
Political science is increasingly focusing on the study of leadership factors in its field scope. Therefore, the primary objective of this article is to systematically analyze the use of leadership theories in scholarly publications of political science. This paper also underscores the lack of leadership theories or concepts in political science, offering insights to anyone interested in examining leadership in this academic discipline. This study introduces an alternative framework for analyzing leadership, specifically emphasizing political leadership. Thus, the question addressed in this study is: What leadership theories are applied to the study of political science? This study utilizes the systematic literature review approach, except for the Appraisal Quality stage, to examine political leadership theory and the notion of utilization as discussed in political science. The ROSE protocol is employed in this study due to its suitability for mapping and qualitative studies. Furthermore, PICo is used to formulate research questions in the context of this study. The results of this study, which involved the review of 75 papers, revealed the implementation of leadership theories and concepts in 15 distinct contexts or focus areas. The analysis of leadership in political science places significant emphasis on the dimensions of transformative and transactional leadership styles. Both leadership styles are frequently used in various research contexts. Overall, the prevalence of transformative and transactional leadership theories in political science can be understood as a reflection of the constraints political scientists face in comprehending the nature of leadership within a political context from a scientific standpoint.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alvesson, M., & Einola, K. (2019). Warning for excessive positivity: Authentic leadership and other traps in leadership studies. Leadership Quarterly, 30(4), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.04.001
Ancarani, A., Arcidiacono, F., Di Mauro, C., & Giammanco, M. D. (2021). Promoting work engagement in public administrations: the role of middle managers’ leadership. Public Management Review, 23(8), 1234–1263. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1763072
Arroyo Barrigüete, J. L., Barcos, L., Bellón, C., & Corzo, T. (2022). One year of European premiers leadership and empathy in times of global pandemic: a Twitter sentiment analysis. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2115693
Bass, B. (1990). An Introduction to Theories and Models of Leadership (B. Bass (ed.); Political). The Free Press.
Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications. In B. M. Bass & R. Bass (Eds.), Free Press2 (3rd ed., Vol. 1, Issue 1). Free Press.
Bennister, M. (2016). New Approaches to Political Leadership. Politics and Governance, 4(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i2.683
Bilal, A., Siddiquei, A., Asadullah, M. A., Awan, H. M., & Asmi, F. (2020). Servant leadership: a new perspective to explore project leadership and team effectiveness. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(3), 699–715. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-12-2019-1975
Boin, A., ’t Hart, P., & Esch, F. van. (2012). Political Leadership in Times of Crisis: Comparing Leader Responses to Financial Turbulence. In L. Helms (Ed.), Comparative Political Leadership (Political, pp. 119–141). Palgrave Macmillan.
Brimhall, K. C., & Palinkas, L. (2020). Using Mixed Methods to Uncover Inclusive Leader Behaviors: A Promising Approach for Improving Employee and Organizational Outcomes. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 27(4), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051820936286
Changar, M., & Atan, T. (2021). The role of transformational and transactional leadership approaches on environmental and ethical aspects of csr. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031411
Cho, Y., Shin, M., Billing, T. K., & Bhagat, R. S. (2019). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and affective organizational commitment: a closer look at their relationships in two distinct national contexts. Asian Business and Management, 18(3), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-019-00059-1
Corpuz, R., D’Alessandro, S., Adeyemo, J., Jankowski, N., & Kandalaft, K. (2020). Life history orientation predicts COVID-19 precautions and projected behaviors. Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01857
Craig, G. (2021). Kindness and Control: The Political Leadership of Jacinda Ardern in the Aotearoa New Zealand COVID-19 Media Conferences. Journalism and Media, 2(2), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia2020017
Cwalina, W., & Drzewiecka, M. (2019). Who Are the Political Leaders We Are Looking for? Candidate Positioning in Terms of Leadership Style. A Cross-Cultural Study in Goleman’s Typology. Journal of Political Marketing, 18(4), 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2019.1678908
Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A., & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0620
Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(25), 36–62.
Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., & Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1), 45–53.
Effendi, T. N. (2003). Globalisasi dan Kemiskinan. In Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (Vols. 7, No. 2, pp. 141–160).
Elgie, R. (2015). Studying Political Leadership: Foundations and Contending Accounts (L. Helms, R. Elgie, T. Inoguchi, G. Peele, & B. A. Rockman (eds.); Political). Palgrave Macmillan.
Fabac, R., Kokot, K., & Bubalo, I. (2022). Path-Goal Theory – Leadership Styles and their Changes during Covid-19 Pandemic. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems : INDECS, 20(4), 349–374. https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.20.4.4
Ford, J., Ford, L., & Polin, B. (2021). Leadership in the Implementation of Change: Functions, Sources, and Requisite Variety. Journal of Change Management, 21(1), 87–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2021.1861697
Fourie, W., & Höhne, F. (2019). Thou shalt not fail? Using theological impulses to critique the heroic bias in transformational leadership theory. Leadership, 15(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715017730453
Gesser-Edelsburg, A., & Hijazi, R. (2020). When politics meets pandemic: How prime minister netanyahu and a small team communicated health and risk information to the Israeli public during the early stages of COVID-19. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 13, 2985–3002. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S280952
Greyson, D., Rafferty, E., Slater, L., MacDonald, N., Bettinger, J. A., Dubé, È., & MacDonald, S. E. (2019). Systematic review searches must be systematic, comprehensive, and transparent: A critique of Perman et al. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6275-y
Groves, K. S. (2020). Testing a Moderated Mediation Model of Transformational Leadership, Values, and Organization Change. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 27(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051816662614
Günzel-Jensen, F., Jain, A. K., & Kjeldsen, A. M. (2018). Distributed leadership in health care: The role of formal leadership styles and organizational efficacy. Leadership, 14(1), 110–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715016646441
Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
Haddaway, N. R., Macura, B., Whaley, P., & Pullin, A. S. (2018). ROSES Reporting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: Pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps. Environmental Evidence, 7(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0121-7
Hannah, S. T., Perez, A. L. U., Lester, P. B., & Quick, J. C. (2020). Bolstering Workplace Psychological Well-Being Through Transactional and Transformational Leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 27(3), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051820933623
Hansbrough, T. K., & Schyns, B. (2018). The Appeal of Transformational Leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, 12(3), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21571
Haque, A., Fernando, M., & Caputi, P. (2020). How is responsible leadership related to the three-component model of organisational commitment? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(5), 1137–1161. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2019-0486
Hartley, J., & Benington, J. (2011). Political Leadership. In A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grint, B. Jakcson, & M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Leadership. Sage Publication.
Helms, L. (2012). Introduction: The Importance of Studying Political Leadership Comparatively. In L. Helms (Ed.), Comparative Political Leadership (Political, pp. 1–24). Palgrave Macmillan.
Helms, L., & Femke, van E. (2017). Turning Structural Weakness into Personal Strength. In M. Bennister, B. Worthy, & P. ‘t Hart (Eds.), The Leadership Capital Index: A New Perspective on Political Leadership (1st ed., pp. 27–44). Oxford University Press.
Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Jüni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savović, J., Schulz, K. F., Weeks, L., & Sterne, J. A. C. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (Online), 343(7829), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928
Islam, M. N., Furuoka, F., & Idris, A. (2022). Transformational leadership and employee championing behavior during organizational change: the mediating effect of work engagement. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-01-2020-0016
Itzkovich, Y., Heilbrunn, S., & Aleksic, A. (2020). Full range indeed? The forgotten dark side of leadership. Journal of Management Development, 39(7–8), 851–868. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-09-2019-0401
Jong, J., & Faerman, S. (2021). The Role of Goal Specificity in the Relationship Between Leadership and Empowerment. Public Personnel Management, 50(4), 559–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026020982330
Kalpokaite, N., & Radivojevic, I. (2020). Leading a Successful Transition to Democracy: A Qualitative Analysis of Political Leadership in Spain and Lithuania. Organization Studies, 41(6), 767–797. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618814555
Kesgin, B. (2020). Features of foreign policy birds: Israeli prime ministers as hawks and doves. Cooperation and Conflict, 55(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836719850208
Keulemans, S., & Groeneveld, S. (2020). Supervisory leadership at the frontlines: Street-level discretion, supervisor influence, and street-level bureaucrats’ attitude towards clients. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(2), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz019
LaRocca, M. A., & Groves, K. S. (2022). Transformational Leadership in Extreme Contexts: Associations with Posttraumatic Growth and Self-Efficacy Among Combat Veterans. Armed Forces and Society, 48(4), 849–871. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X211030610
Laustsen, L., & Petersen, M. B. (2020). Why are right-wing voters attracted to dominant leaders? Assessing competing theories of psychological mechanisms. Leadership Quarterly, 31(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.06.002
Lewin, P. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunity as the potential to create value. Review of Austrian Economics, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-013-0245-5
Lin, C. H. V., & Sun, J. M. J. (2018). Chinese employees’ leadership preferences and the relationship with power distance orientation and core self-evaluation. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11782-018-0027-9
Loan, F. A., & Sheikh, S. (2018). Is Google scholar really scholarly? Library Hi Tech News, 35(3), 7–9.
Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062
Maartandan Suppiah, S., Ahmad, M. K., & Nirubagunasekaran, H. (2018). Mahathir’s leadership communication: Exploring the Indians’ political and non-governmental organisations experience. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 34(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2018-3402-13
Mali, N. V., Yerramsetti, S., & Manoharan, A. P. (2021). Communicative governance to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of Delhi, India. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 10(2), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.20210401.oa10
Mantzouranis, K. (2018). Thucydides’ Assessments of Pericles and Alcibiades as a Lesson in Leadership Ethics. Polis (United Kingdom), 35(2), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1163/20512996-12340178
Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177.
Mohamed Shaffril, H. A., Samsuddin, S. F., & Abu Samah, A. (2021). The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners. Quality and Quantity, 55(4), 1319–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6
Montiel, C. J., Uyheng, J., & Dela Paz, E. (2021). The Language of Pandemic Leaderships: Mapping Political Rhetoric During the COVID-19 Outbreak. Political Psychology, 0(0), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12753
Müller, H., & Van Esch, F. A. W. J. (2020). The contested nature of political leadership in the European Union: conceptual and methodological cross-fertilisation. West European Politics, 43(5), 1051–1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1678951
Muralidharan, E., & Pathak, S. (2018). Sustainability, transformational leadership, and social entrepreneurship. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020567
Nahavandi, A., & Corbett, L. (2018). Leaping into public leadership. International Journal of Public Leadership, 14(4), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpl-06-2018-0027
Nxumalo, L. (2019). Utilising transformational leadership to implement disability laws in the South African workplace. South African Journal on Human Rights, 35(4), 351–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2020.1740888
Ofosu-Anim, D. (2022). Political Leadership: A New Conceptual Framework. Open Journal of Leadership, 11(04), 398–421. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2022.114021
Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37.
Park, J., & Chung, E. (2021). Learning from past pandemic governance: Early response and Public-Private Partnerships in testing of COVID-19 in South Korea. World Development, 137(April 2020), 105198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105198
Pérezts, M., Russon, J. A., & Painter, M. (2020). This Time from Africa: Developing a Relational Approach to Values-Driven Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(4), 731–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04343-0
Pike, K., & Diamond, P. (2021). Myth and meaning: ‘Corbynism’ and the interpretation of political leadership. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 23(4), 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148121996252
Robinson, P., & Lowe, J. (2015). Literature reviews vs systematic reviews. In Australian and New Zealand journal of public health (Vol. 39, Issue 2, p. 103).
Samanta, I., & Lamprakis, A. (2018). Modern leadership types and outcomes: The case of Greek public sector. Management (Croatia), 23(1), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.30924/mjcmi/2018.23.1.173
Seidel, A., Saurin, T. A., Tortorella, G. L., & Marodin, G. A. (2019). How can general leadership theories help to expand the knowledge of lean leadership? Production Planning and Control, 30(16), 1322–1336. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1612112
Shaw, M. E., & Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Theory and Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4), 584. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391816
Smirles, K. E. S., Basile, K. A., Aughenbaugh, A., Nasser, S., Logue, S., & Arteaga, L. (2020). Japanese women’s perceptions of gender roles and leadership and the effects of a Women & Leadership Course: A qualitative analysis. Women’s Studies International Forum, 80(July 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2020.102359
Sobral, F., Carvalho, J., Łagowska, U., Furtado, L. M. G. P., & Grobman, M. (2020). Better safe than sorry: Leadership sensemaking in the time of covid-19. Revista de Administracao Publica, 54(4), 758–781. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220200262x
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2019). Designing Institutional Platforms and Arenas for Interactive Political Leadership. Public Management Review, 21(10), 1443–1463. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1559342
Suaib, E., Zuada, L. H., & Syifatu, W. (2016). Desentralisasi dan Oligarki Predator di Wakatobi: Peran Oligarki dan Elit Penentu dalam Pembangunan Perdesaan. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 13(2), 167–191.
Torfing, J., & Sørensen, E. (2019). Interactive political leadership in theory and practice: how elected politicians may benefit from co-creating public value outcomes. Administrative Sciences, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9030051
Young, H. R., Glerum, D. R., Joseph, D. L., & McCord, M. A. (2021). A Meta-Analysis of Transactional Leadership and Follower Performance: Double-Edged Effects of LMX and Empowerment. Journal of Management, 47(5), 1255–1280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320908646
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v14i1.12279
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
