Discretion and Decentralization: Public Administrators Dilemmas in Bureaucracy Innovation Initiatives

Lesmana Rian Andhika

Abstract


Policy discretion shall not be construed as a free authority by the public administrator. The positive side discretion is answered to an urgent need, the ambiguity caused the existing policy. The focus this researched would like to explore further the public administrator dilemmas perform some correlation between policy discretion and decentralization, discretion and initiation of bureaucracy innovation. The research method applied is qualitative, descriptive analysis is adopted based on secondary data and information sources. Triangulation is used to draw conclusions carefully from a variety of data sources. The research concludes the initiation of bureaucracy innovation is the urgent needs at this time, and discretion one of the tools that can be used as a policy outside the formal policy not set explicitly on the different the element related with innovation. The unique thing is not all public administrators like and can do discretion, there is a logical consideration that must be met to assess and translate discretion, capability and sufficient knowledge is some logical considerations it is. Bias interpretation will cause negative effects like opening a chance doing the corruption, collusion, nepotism and the occurrence of criminalization policy procedures.


Keywords


discretion; public administrator dilemmas; bureaucracy innovation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alberti, A., & Bertucci, G. (2007). Innovation in Governance and Public Administration: Key Issues and Perspectives. In D. o. Affairs, Innovations in Governance in the Middle East, North Africa, and Western Balkans: Making Governments Work Better in the Mediterranean Region (pp. 3-12). New York: United Nations.

Amrizal, Rani, F., Ginting, B., & Tarigan, P. (2015). Asymmetric Decentralization Aceh; Governor Consultation and Consideration Context on Central Government Administrative Policy. Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 20(9), 01-10. doi:10.9790/0837-20950110

Anttiroiko, A.-V., Bailey, S. J., & Valkama, P. (2011). Innovations in Public Governance in the Western World. Amsterdam: IOS Press BV.

Bannink, D., & Ossewaarde, R. (2012). Decentralization: New Modes of Governance and Administrative Responsibility. Administration & Society, 44(5), 595 –624. doi:10.1177/0095399711419096

Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a Multidisciplinary Definition of Innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323-1339. doi:10.1108/00251740910984578

Beazer, Q. H. (2011). Risk in Regions: Bureaucratic Discretion, Regulatory Uncertainty, and Private Investment in the Russian Federation. Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy, The Ohio State University, Ohio.

Borins, S. (2008). Research on Innovations in Government: What Next? In S. Borins, Innovations in Government: Research, Recognition, and Replication (pp. 199-205). Washington D.C: Brookings Institution Press.

Bowman, A., & Kearney, R. (2011). State and Local Government (8th ed.). Boston: Cangange Learning.

Caiden, G. E. (2009). Administrative Reform. Chicago: Aldine Transaction.

Cheema, G. S., & Rondinelli, D. A. (2007). Decentralizing Governance: Emerging Concept and Practice. Washington D.C: Brookings Institution Press.

Chiao, V. (2016). Discretion and Domination in Criminal Procedure: Reflections on Pettit. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 15(1), 92-110. doi:10.1177/1470594X15599104

Cox III, R. W., Hill, M. L., & Pyakuryal, S. (2008). Tacit Knowledge and Discretionary Judgement. Public Integrity, 10(2), 151-164. doi:10.2753/PIN1099-9922100204

Davidson, N. M. (2017). Localist Administrative Law. The Yale Law Journal, 126(3), 564-634.

DiRienzo, C., & Das, J. (2014). Innovation and Role of Corruption and Diversity: A Cross-Country Study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 15(1), 51-72. doi:10.1177/1470595814554790

Dubois, H. F., & Fattore, G. (2009). Definitions and Typologies in Public Administration Research: The Case of Decentralization. International

Journal of Public Administration, 32(8), 704-727. doi:10.1080/01900690902908760

Dye, T. R. (2013). Understanding Public Policy (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Flick, U. (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (4th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.

Galavan, R., Murray, J., & Markides, C. (2008). Strategy, Innovation, and Change: Challenges for Management. New York: Oxford University Press .

Goodin, R. E., Rein, M., & Moran, M. (2006). The Public and its Policies. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Goodin, The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy (pp. 3-38). New York: Oxford University Press .

Goodsell, C. T. (2015). New Case Bureaucracy. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Grindle, M. S. (2007). Going Local Decentralization, Democratization, and the Promise of Good Governance. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Henderson, A., Țiclău, T., & Balica, D. (2017). Perceptions of Discretion in Street-Level Public Service: Examining Administrative Governance in Romania. Public Performance & Management Review, 1-28. doi:10.1080/15309576.2017.1400987

Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2002). Implementing Public Policy: Governance in Theory and in Practice. London: SAGE Publications.

Ho, K. L. (2011). Reinventing the Bureaucracy? Malaysia's New Administrative Reform Initiatives. Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 1(1), 87-104. doi:10.1080/15339114.2002.9678351

Holzhacker, R. L., Wittek, R., & Woltjer, J. (2016). Decentralization and Governance in Indonesia. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.

Howe, L. E. (2014). Administrative Law and Governmentality: Politics and Discretion in a Changing State of Sovereignty. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 24(1), 55-80. doi:10.1080/10841806.2002.11029340

Hulst, R., Mafuru, W., & Mpenzi, D. (2015). Fifteen Years After Decentralization by Devolution: Political-Administrative Relations in Tanzanian Local Government. Public Administration Development, 35(5), 360-371. doi:10.1002/pad.1743

Kaasa, A., & Vadi, M. (2010). How Does Culture Contribute to Innovation? Evidence from European Countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(7), 583-604. doi:10.1080/10438590902987222

Keeler, R. L. (2013). Managing Outsourced Administrative Discretion. State and Local Government Review, 45(3), 183-188. doi:10.1177/0160323X13496108

Kim, D.-R., & Yoon, J.-H. (2017). Decentralization, Government Capacity, and Environmental Policy Performance: A Cross National Analysis. International Journal of Public Administration, 1-11. doi:10.1080/01900692.2017.1318917

Kim, S., & Han, C. (2014). Administrative Reform in South Korea: New Public Management and the Bureaucracy. International Review of Administrative Science, 0(0), 1-19. doi:10.1177/0020852314558034

Klimentova, S. (2014). Innovation in the Public Sector: Is it Measurable. Studies in Managerial and Financial Accounting, 28, 289-315. doi:10.1108/S1479-351220140000028021

Kwon, I. (2014). Motivation, Discretion, and Corruption. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 765–794. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus062

Law Republic of Indonesia Number 23 of 2014 on Local Government.

Law Republic of Indonesia Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration.

Ledeneva, A., Bratu, R., & Köker, P. (2017). Corruption Studies for the Twenty-First Century: Paradigm Shifts and Innovative Approaches. The

Slavonic and East European Review, 95(1), 1-20. doi:10.5699/slaveasteurorev2.95.1.0001

Mahagaonkar, P. (2008). Corruption and innovation: A Grease or Sand Relationship? Retrieved from Jena Economic Research Papers, #2008-017: http://www.econbiz.de/archiv1/2009/63495_grease_sand_relationship.pdf

Mantzaris, E. (2016). Innovative Leadership Against Corruption in the Public Sector: The Case for South Africa. African Journal of Public Affairs, 9(1), 59-69.

McLaughlin, G. C., & Kennedy, W. R. (2016). A Guide to Innovation Processes and Solutions for Government. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Mutereko, S., & Chitakunye, P. (2015). Discretion and Autonomy: Public Administrators’ Dilemmas in the Implementation of National Curriculum Statements. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(2), 143-155. doi:10.1080/01900692.2014.934835

Neudorfer, B., & Neudorfer, N. S. (2014). Decentralization and Political Corruption: Disaggregating Regional Authority. Publius:The Journal of

Federalism, 45(1), 24-50. doi:1093/publius/pju035

Ombudsman. (2016). Laporan Tahunan 2015. Jakarta: Ombudsman Republik Indonesia.

Patel, T., & Patel, C. (2008). Learning Cultures for Sustained Innovation Success. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 21(3), 233-251. doi:10.1080/13511610802404914

Parry, R. (2008). Changing UK Governance Under Devolution. Public Policy and Administration, 23(1), 114-120. doi:10.1177/0952076707083290

Pepinsky, T. B., & Wihardja, M. M. (2011). Decentralization and Economic Performance in Indonesia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 11(3), 337-371. doi:10.1017/S1598240800007372

Piening, E. P. (2011). Insights into the Process Dynamics of Innovation Implementation. Public Management Review, 13(1), 127-157. doi:10.1080/14719037.2010.501615

Prasojo, E. (2014, Oktober 07). Diskresi Bukan Berarti Kewenangan Bebas. Retrieved from Kementrian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi: https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/2650-diskresi-bukan-berarti-kewenangan-bebas

Presidential Regulation Number 80 of 2010 on Grand Design of bureaucratic reform 2010-2025.

Regulation Minister of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform Number 20 of 2017 on Determination Top 99 Public Service Innovations of 2017.

Rosenbloom, D. H., O'Leary, R., & Chanin, J. (2010). Public Administration and Law (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Sahaym, A., Trevino, L. J., & Steensma, H. K. (2012). The Influence of Managerial Discretion, Innovation, and Uncertainty on Export Intensity: A Real Options Perspective. International Business Review, 21(6), 1131-1147. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.01.003

Smokes, P. (2015). Rethinking Decentralization: Assessing Challenges to a Popular Public Sector Reform. Public Administration Development, 35(2), 97-112. doi:10.1002/pad.1703

Styhre, A. (2007). The Innovative Bureaucracy: Bureaucracy in an of Fluidity. New York: Routledge.

Tamanaha, B. Z. (2012). The History ans Element of Rule of Law. Singapore journal of Legal Studies, 232–247.

Tarlton, C. D. (1965). Symmetry and Asymmetry as Elements of Federalism: A Theoretical Speculation. The Journal of Politics, 27(4), 861-874. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2128123 .

Torfing, J., & Triantafillou, P. (2016). Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2013). Policy Implementation, Street Level Bureaucracy, and the Importance of Discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527-547. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.841978

Valkama, P., Bailey, S. J., & Anttiroiko, A.-V. (2013). Organizational Innovation in Public Services: Form and Governance (1st ed.). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Vries, H. d., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2015). Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematics Review and Future Research Agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146-166. doi:10.1111/padm.12209

Wangrow, D. B., Schepker, D. J., & Barker III, V. L. (2015). Managerial Discretion: An Empirical Review and Focus on Future Research Directions. Journal of Management, 41(1), 99-135. doi:10.1177/0149206314554214

Witt, M. D. (2017). Discretion in Decision Making: The Fonterra Case. Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy , The University of Waikato , Hamilton.

Wood, C. (2011). Understanding the Consequences of Municipal Discretion. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(4), 411-427. doi:10.1177/0275074010381111

Yilmaz, S., Beris, Y., & Serrano-Berthet, R. (2008). Local Government Discretion and Accountability: A Diagnostic Framework for Local Governance. Washington, D.C: The World Bank.

Yilmaz, S., Beris, Y., & Serrano-Berthet, R. (2010). Linking Local Government Discretion and Accountability in Decentralisation. Development Policy Review, 28(3), 259-293. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7679.2010.00484.x

Young, T. E. (2010). How Government Officials With Discretion Make Decisions: Case Study of Tax Law. A Dissertation Submitted Doctor of Philosophy, University of Utah, Utah.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v8i1.1040

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Creative Commons License

Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 
 
View My Stats