Spatial Generation, Degeneration, and Regeneration Aerotaxis Mechanisms Toward Bio-Integrated Design
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/d7synp84
Aerotaxis, Spatial Mechanism, Microorganism, Biological Process, Bio-based Design
Abstract
This study aims to explore spatial mechanism developed within bio-integrated design through exploring the complex natural processes of "aerotaxis". The investigation of aerotaxis employs the Azospirillum brasilense by observing its behavior and interaction within its habitat and to identify possible spatial mechanisms. Azospirillum brasilense, a microorganism known for aiding plant growth and nitrogen fixation, demonstrates a symbiotic relationship with its host, inspiring innovative architectural approaches. By tracing its movement, living pattern and traces show distinct mechanisms such as the generation, degeneration, and regeneration of space. This framework redefines architectural spatial and material concepts that are arguably crucial for a bio-integrated design. The study shows that the aerotaxis mechanism generates spaces as a dynamic continuum where materials are synthesized, consumed, and renewed in balance. Understanding the biological processes offers an alternative framework in designing space structures that align with nature's complex systems. Such an approach provides a pathway to foster a deeper intertwining between architecture and biological processes. As a result, the study highlights the potential of bio-based design mechanisms as a regenerative practice.
References
Alexander, C. (2002). A vision of a living world: an essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe. Center for Environmental Structure.
Bouvard, J., Douarche, C., Mergaert, P., Auradou, H., & Moisy, F. (2022). Direct measurement of the aerotactic response in a bacterial suspension. Physical Review E, 1. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.09.483614
Caro, V. D. (2022). Resilience as an investigation of the relationship between architecture and nature. ARSNET, 02(01). https://doi.org/10.7454/arsnet.v2i1.46
Claudia, P., & Marco, P. (2020). Bio-digital aesthetics as value system of post-Anthropocene architecture. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 18(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771209229
Collet, C. (2021). Designing Our Future Bio-Materiality. AI & SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01013-y
Crutzen, P. J. (2002). Geology of Mankind (415, 23 ed.). Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/415023a
Cruz-Hernandez, M. A., Herrera, A. M., Garcia, V. B., & Rivera, G. (2022). Azospirillum spp. from plant growth-promoting bacteria to their use in bioremediation. Microorganisms, 10(1057), 23. 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10051057
Elmas, M., Alexiades, V., O'Neal, L., & Alexandre, G. (2019). Modeling aerotaxis band formation in Azospirillum brasilense. BMC Microbiology, 19(101), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1468-9
Ewida, Y. M. (2024). Spatial synergies: Between humans and non-human citizens: A critical literature review. Journal of Salutogenic Architecture, 3(No 1), 114-124. https://doi.org/10.38027/jsalutogenic_vol3no1_9
Ferrando, F. (2014). Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialism. Differences and Relations. Existenz, 8(2), 26-32.
Gazit, M. (2016). Living Matter: Biomaterials for Design and Architecture. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Gibson, J. J. (2014). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition. Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218
Harani, A. R. (2023). Learning from nature: Exploring systems of plants and animals for form generation. ARSNET, 03(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/arsnet.v3i1.73
Paramita, K. D. (2023). Reinventing architecture through interpretation and reproduction. ARSNET,03(02). https://doi.org/10.7454/arsnet.v3i2.91
Paramita, K. D. (2025). Translating the architectural language of localities. ARSNET, 05. https://doi.org/10.7454/arsnet.v5i1.149
Paramita, K. D., Yatmo, Y. A., & Atmodiwirjo, P. (2024). Multispecies contact zones: The entangled interior grounds of domestic livestock keeping. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/20419112.2024.2335022
Pasquero, C. (2020). Bio-digital aesthetics as value system of post-Anthropocene architecture. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077120922941
Popp, F., Armitage, J. P., & Schüller, D. (2014). Polarity of bacterial magnetotaxis is controlled by aerotaxis through a common sensory pathway. Nature Communications, 5(5398), 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6398
Schleicher, S., Kontominas, G., Makker, T., Tatli, I., & Yavaribajestani, Y. (2019). Studio ne: A new teaching model for exploring bio-inspired design and fabrication. Biomimetics, 4(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics4020034
Sekardini, H., & Suryantini, R. (2025). Speculating a swarm-based symbiotic architecture in the era of Mothering Nature. ARSNET, 05(01). https://doi.org/10.7454/arsnet.v5i1.146
Thomsen, M. R., & Tamke, M. (2022). Towards a transformational eco-metabolistic bio-based design framework in architecture. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 17(No 4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ac62e2
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Linears

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.