Latar Belakang Penilaian Pengguna Terhadap Kualitas Ruang Terbuka Publik Pelataran Masjid Gedhe Kauman Yogyakarta

Wahyu Saputra, Rahmayanti Rahmayanti

Abstract


Ruang terbuka publik merupakan hal yang penting untuk meningkatkan kualitas hidup masyarakat. Para peneliti telah menyelidiki cara untuk menilai ruang terbuka publik yang baik. Meski demikian, berbagai aspek yang digunakan untuk mengevaluasi kualitas ruang terbuka publik masih perlu dielaborasi secara mendalam. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendalami berbagai aspek yang digunakan untuk menilai kualitas ruang terbuka publik berdasarkan persepsi pengguna. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian campuran sekuensial eksplanatori. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa aspek keamanan, kenyamanan, dan aksesibilitas memiliki  latar belakang penilaian yang berbeda yang ditunjukkan oleh adanya nilai simpangan >0,50 dari penilaian kedua kelompok pengguna dan tidak ada latar belakang yang berbeda untuk aspek image.

Keywords


Latar belakang penilaian, pesepsi, ruang terbuka publik

Full Text:

PDF

References


S. Alvarado Vazquez and C. Casiano Flores, “The perception of public spaces in Mexico city, a governance

approach,” Journal of Urban Management, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 72–81, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jum.2021.10.002.

A. Madanipour, “Roles and challenges of urban design,” J Urban Des (Abingdon), vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 173–193,

, doi: 10.1080/13574800600644035.

G. Varna, Measuring Public Space: The Star Model. England: Ashgate, 2014.

W. ZHU, J. WANG, and B. QIN, “Quantity or quality? Exploring the association between public open space and

mental health in urban China,” Landsc Urban Plan, vol. 213, no. April, p. 104128, 2021, doi:

1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104128.

R. Bambó Naya, P. de la Cal Nicolás, C. Díez Medina, I. Ezquerra, S. García-Pérez, and J. Monclús, “Quality of

public space and sustainable development goals: analysis of nine urban projects in Spanish cities,” Frontiers of

Architectural Research, no. xxxx, pp. 1–23, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2023.01.002.

D. Halim, Psikologi Arsitektur Pengantar Kajian Lintas Disiplin. Jakarta: Grasindo, 2005.

W. Saputra and A. Sarwadi, “Persepsi Pengguna Terhadap Kualitas Ruang Terbuka Publik Pelataran Masjid

Gedhe Kauman Melalui Pendekatan Placemaking,” Jurnal Arsitektur dan Perencanaan (JUARA), vol. 2, no. 1,

pp. 1–16, 2019, doi: 10.31101/juara.v2i1.872.

Haryadi and B. Setiawan, Arsitektur, Lingkungan dan Perilaku Pengantar ke Teori, Metodologi dan Aplikasi.

Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2014.

J. W. Creswell, RESEARCH DESIGN Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Campuran, Ke Empat. in

Bahasa Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2016.

A. H. Askari and S. Soltani, “Determinants of a successful public open space: the case of Dataran Merdeka in the

city centre of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,” Landsc Res, vol. 6397, pp. 1–12, 2018, doi:

1080/01426397.2018.1427221.

M. Carmona, S. Tiesdell, T. Heath, and T. Oc, Public Places Urban Spaces The Dimensions of Urban Design.

UK: Routledge, 2010.

I. S. Cho, C. K. Heng, and Z. Trivic, Re-Framing Urban Space, Pertama. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2016.

J. Gehl, Life between buildings: Using public space (J.Koch, Trans. First Ed.). ISLANDPRESS, 2011.

N. Pasaogullari and N. Doratli, “Measuring accessibility and utilization of public spaces in Famagusta,” Cities,

vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 225–232, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2004.03.003.

S. R. M. Sakip, N. M. Akhir, and S. S. Omar, “Determinant Factors of Successful Public Parks in Malaysia,”

Procedia Soc Behav Sci, vol. 170, pp. 422–432, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.003.

M. Nikšič and G. B. Watson, “Urban public open space in the mental image of users: the elements connecting

urban public open spaces in a spatial network,” J Urban Des (Abingdon), vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 859–882, 2018, doi:

1080/13574809.2017.1377066.

Antariksa, Teori dan Metode Pelestarian Arsitektur & Lingkungan Binaan. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka,

R. Trancik, Finding Lost Space. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1986.

H. Sanoff, Visual Research Methods in Design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1991.

C. Moughtin, Urban Design Street and Square, Third Edit. Architectural Press, 2003.

B. C. Welsh, M. E. Mudge, and D. P. Farrington, “Reconceptualizing public area surveillance and crime

prevention : Security guards , place managers and defensible space,” Security Journal, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 299–

, 2009, doi: 10.1057/sj.2008.22.

E. Salehi, “The impacts of environmental factors in crime occurrence and safety of Tehran’s citizens,” Crime

Law Soc Change, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 457–467, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10611-012-9392-z.

J. Németh and S. Schmidt, “Toward a methodology for measuring the security of publicly accessible spaces,”

Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 283–297, 2007, doi:

1080/01944360708977978.

O. Newman, “Defensible Space: A New Physical Planning Tool for Urban Revitalization,” Journal of the

American Planning Association, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 149–155, 1995, doi: 10.1080/01944369508975629.

J. Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities. United States of America: Random House, 1961.

V. Mehta, “Evaluating Public Space,” J Urban Des (Abingdon), vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 53–88, 2014, doi:

1080/13574809.2013.854698.

H. Lim, C. Kim, J. E. Eck, and J. Kim, “The crime-reduction effects of open-street CCTV in South Korea,”

Security Journal, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 241–255, 2016, doi: 10.1057/sj.2013.10.

Suk-Kyung Kim, Y. M. Lee, and E. Lee, “THE DEFENSIBLE SPACE THEORY FOR CREATING SAFE

URBAN NEIGHBORHOODS : PERCEPTIONS AND DESIGN IMPLICATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES

AND SOUTH KOREA,” J Archit Plann Res, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 181–196, 2013.

S. Lenzholzer, W. Klemm, and C. Vasilikou, “Qualitative methods to explore thermo-spatial perception in

outdoor urban spaces,” Urban Clim, vol. 23, pp. 231–249, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.10.003.

G. Varna and S. Tiesdell, “Assessing the publicness of public space: The Star Model of publicness,” J Urban Des

(Abingdon), vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 575–598, 2010, doi: 10.1080/13574809.2010.502350.

H. Zamanifard, T. Alizadeh, C. Bosman, and E. Coiacetto, “Measuring experiential qualities of urban public

spaces: users’ perspective,” J Urban Des (Abingdon), vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 340–364, 2019, doi:

1080/13574809.2018.1484664.

N. Djongyang, R. Tchinda, and D. Njomo, “Thermal comfort: A review paper,” Renewable and Sustainable

Energy Reviews, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 2626–2640, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.040.

K. Park, “Psychological park accessibility: a systematic literature review of perceptual components affecting park

use,” Landsc Res, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 508–520, 2017, doi: 10.1080/01426397.2016.1267127.

W. G. Hansen, “How Accessibility Shapes Land Use,” Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 25,

no. 2, pp. 73–76, 1959, doi: 10.1080/01944365908978307.

A. El-Geneidy, M. Grimsrud, R. Wasfi, P. Tétreault, and J. Surprenant-Legault, “New evidence on walking

distances to transit stops: Identifying redundancies and gaps using variable service areas,” Transportation (Amst),

vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 193–210, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s11116-013-9508-z.

D. van Soest, M. R. Tight, and C. D. F. Rogers, “Exploring the distances people walk to access public transport,”

Transp Rev, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 160–182, 2020, doi: 10.1080/01441647.2019.1575491.

F. Zhao, L. F. Chow, M. T. Li, I. Ubaka, and A. Gan, “Forecasting transit walk accessibility: Regression model

alternative to buffer method,” Transp Res Rec, no. 1835, pp. 34–41, 2003, doi: 10.3141/1835-05.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/j-linears.v6i1.10524

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Linears

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Linears is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Flag Counter

View My Stats