A STUDY DESIGN REVIEW: OPHTHALMIC ARTERY DOPPLER IN PREECLAMPSIA STUDY

YURI KAMILA, LEGIRAN LEGIRAN

Abstract


Preeclampsia screening is a must for all pregnant women. Predicting preeclampsia using the ocular artery Doppler and comparing its efficacy to the uterine artery Doppler, which is now believed to be the most accurate tool in use, have both been the subjects of several studies. Depending on the research design, a number of investigations were conducted using various methods. The research proccess and, naturally, the findings will be impacted by the study design chosen. This study aims to review and evaluate the study designs of numerous recent studies on ocular artery Doppler in preeclamptic patients. It is a literature review that compiles articles from current English-language publications published in the years 2020 to 2023. The articles were found using the PubMed, Wiley, and BMJ search engines. Our findings show that the various study designs that were used had advantages and disadvantages. Future research ought to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages before selecting a study design.

Keywords:  preeclampsia, ophthalmic artery Doppler, study design


Keywords


preeclampsia, ophthalmic artery Doppler, study design

Full Text:

PDF

References


Perkumpulan Obstetri Dan Ginekologi Indonesia. Pedoman Nasional Pelayanan Kedokteran Diagnosis dan Tatalaksana Preeklamsia. 2016.

Fox R, Kitt J, Leeson P, Aye CYL, Lewandowski AJ. Preeclampsia: Risk Factors, Diagnosis, Management, and the Cardiovascular Impact on the Offspring. J Clin Med. 2019;8(10).

Phipps EA, Thadhani R, Benzing T, Karumanchi SA. Pre-eclampsia: pathogenesis, novel diagnostics and therapies. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019;15(5):275.

J Spaan J, A Brown M. Renin-angiotensin system in pre-eclampsia: everything old is new again. Obstet Med. 2012;5(4):147–53.

Lopez-Mendez MA, Martinez-Gaytan V, Cortes-Flores R, Ramos-Gonzalez RM, Ochoa-Torres MA, Garza-Veloz I, et al. Doppler ultrasound evaluation in preeclampsia. BMC Res Notes. 2013;6(1):477.

Logue OC, George EM, Bidwell GL. Preeclampsia and the Brain: Neural Control of Cardiovascular Changes During Pregnancy and Neurological Outcomes of Preeclampsia. Clin Sci (Lond). 2016;130(16):1417.

Michalinos A, Zogana S, Kotsiomitis E, Mazarakis A, Troupis T. Anatomy of the Ophthalmic Artery: A Review concerning Its Modern Surgical and Clinical Applications. Anat Res Int. 2015;2015:1–8.

Dai X, Kang L, Ge H. Doppler parameters of ophthalmic artery in women with preeclampsia: A meta-analysis. J Clin Hypertens. 2023 Jan 1;25(1):5–12.

Shahid N, Masood M, Bano Z, Naz U, Hussain SF, Anwar A, et al. Role of Uterine Artery Doppler Ultrasound in Predicting Pre-Eclampsia in High-Risk Women. Cureus. 2021;13(7).

Mellis CM. How to choose your study design. J Paediatr Child Health. 2020;56(7):1018–22.

Selima ER, Magdy Abar A, Abd B, Dessouky E. Role of Ophthalmic Artery Doppler in Prediction of Preeclampsia [Internet]. Vol. 87, The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2022. Available from: https://ejhm.journals.ekb.eg/

Zhu J, Zhang J, Syaza Razali N, Chern B, Tan KH. Mean arterial pressure for predicting preeclampsia in Asian women: A longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 13;11(8).

Sarno M, Wright A, Vieira N, Sapantzoglou I, Charakida M, Nicolaides KH. Ophthalmic artery Doppler in prediction of pre-eclampsia at 35–37 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020 Nov 1;56(5):717–24.

Naemi M, Saleh M, Saleh M. Ophthalmic Artery Doppler Indices Changes in Preeclampsia. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Cancer Research. 2023 Jan 1;8(2):125–30.

Kusuma RA, Nurdiati DS, Al Fattah AN, Danukusumo D, Abdullah S, Sini I. Ophthalmic artery Doppler for pre-eclampsia prediction at the first trimester: a Bayesian survival-time model. J Ultrasound. 2022;26(1):155-162.

Andrade C. Research Design: Cohort Studies. Indian J Psychol Med. 2022;44(2):189.

Wang X, Kattan MW. Cohort Studies: Design, Analysis, and Reporting. Chest. 2020;158(1S):S72–8.

Wang X, Cheng Z. Cross-Sectional Studies: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Recommendations. Chest. 2020;158(1S):S65–71.

Kesmodel US. Cross-sectional studies - what are they good for? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(4):388–93.

Hernandez A V., Marti KM, Roman YM. Meta-Analysis. Chest. 2020;158(1S):S97–102.

Lee YH. An overview of meta-analysis for clinicians. Korean J Intern Med. 2018;33(2):277–83.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26618/aimj.v7i1.10931

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Yuri Kamila, Legiran Legiran

Creative Commons License
Al-Iqra Medical Journal: Jurnal Ilmiah Kedokteran under by Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.