Persuasive communication in policing and public response: implication for governance and state legitimacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/d1e6y845Keywords:
persuasive communication, policing institution, political Communication, public trust, public responseAbstract
In contemporary governance, policing institutions are increasingly evaluated not only by theirability to maintain public order but also by their effectiveness in communicating with citizens.Persuasive communication has become essential in shaping legitimacy, strengthening trust, and encouraging positive public responses. This study aims to examine how persuasive communication influences public response from a political communication perspective, both directly and indirectly through political communication and public trust. A quantitative explanatory approach was employed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Data were collected from 150 respondents who had been exposed to police communication through official media channels, online platforms, or direct interaction. The analysis involved measurement model testing, structural model evaluation, and mediation analysis. The findings indicate that persuasive communication has a significant positive effect on political communication and public response. Political communication also positively influences public response, while public trust plays an important role in strengthening favorable reactions from citizens. Furthermore, political communication and public trust significantly mediate the relationship between persuasive communication and public response. These results demonstrate that public response is shaped not only by institutional authority or policy substance, but also by communication quality, credibility, and trust-building efforts. In conclusion, persuasive communication is a strategic instrument for modern policing institutions seeking stronger legitimacy and sustainable public support. Effective communication strategies that emphasize transparency, consistency, responsiveness, and trust are necessary to improve relationships between police institutions and society in the digital era.
References
Alyukov, M. (2023). Harnessing distrust: News, credibility heuristics, and war in an authoritarian regime. Political Communication, 40(5), 527–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2196951
Bach, P., Schmitt, C. E., & McGregor, S. C. (2025). Let me be perfectly unclear: strategic ambiguity in political communication. Communication Theory, 35(2), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaf001
Böhmer, K. (2023). Does hatred rule political communication on social media? How do politicians talk about the EU on Facebook, and how do their followers react? Politics in Central Europe, 18(4), 477–498. https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2022-0021
Braca, A., & Dondio, P. (2023). Developing persuasive systems for marketing: The interplay of persuasion techniques, customer traits and persuasive message design. Italian Journal of Marketing, 2023(3), 369–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43039-023-00077-0
Brown, D. K., & Mourão, R. R. (2022). No reckoning for the right: How political ideology, protest tolerance and news consumption affect support Black Lives Matter protests. Political Communication, 39(6), 737–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2121346
Bucy, E. P., & Joo, J. (2021). Editors’ introduction: Visual politics, grand collaborative programs, and the opportunity to think big. In The International Journal of Press/Politics (Vol. 26, Issue 1, pp. 5–21). SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
Ekman, M., & Widholm, A. (2024). Parasitic news: Adoption and adaption of journalistic conventions in hybrid political communication. Journalism, 25(2), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221136
Feldman, O. (2023). Assessing the politics of debasement: From impoliteness to demonization in political communication. In Political debasement: Incivility, contempt, and humiliation in parliamentary and public discourse (pp. 1–28). Springer.
Fisher, J., Gadjanova, E., & Hitchen, J. (2024). WhatsApp and political communication in West Africa: Accounting for differences in parties’ organization and message discipline online. Party Politics, 30(5), 934–948. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068823118869
Flusberg, S. J., Holmes, K. J., Thibodeau, P. H., Nabi, R. L., & Matlock, T. (2024). The psychology of framing: How everyday language shapes the way we think, feel, and act. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 25(3), 105–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006241246966
Gillies, J., Raynauld, V., & Wisniewski, A. (2026). Canada is no exception: The 2022 Freedom Convoy, political entanglement, and identity-driven protest. American Behavioral Scientist, 70(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642231166885
Harff, D., & Schmuck, D. (2023). Influencers as empowering agents? Following political influencers, internal political efficacy and participation among youth. Political Communication, 40(2), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2166631
Hsiao, Y., & Radnitz, S. (2021). Allies or agitators? How partisan identity shapes public opinion about violent or nonviolent protests. Political Communication, 38(4), 479–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1793848
Huber, L. M. (2022). Beyond policy: The use of social group appeals in party communication. Political Communication, 39(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1998264
Johnson, P. L. (2026). Criminal communication: Public representations, repertoires, and regimes of criminal governance. Perspectives on Politics, 24(1), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592724001956
Knudsen, E., Nordø, Å. D., & Iversen, M. H. (2023). How rally-round-the-flag effects shape trust in the news media: Evidence from panel waves before and during the covid-19 pandemic crisis. Political Communication, 40(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2168322
Kulachai, W., Chayanon, S., & Srisorn, W. (2024). Political communication and political success: The art of effective messaging. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 45(2), 681–694. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kjss/article/view/272038
Lawson, B. T., & Lugo-Ocando, J. (2022). Political communication, press coverage and public interpretation of public health statistics during the coronavirus pandemic in the UK. European Journal of Communication, 37(6), 646–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231221099407
Miller, A. C. (2022). DictatorErdogan: How social media bans trigger backlash. Political Communication, 39(6), 801. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2109084
Neubaum, G., & Weeks, B. (2023). Computer-mediated political expression: A conceptual framework of technological affordances and individual tradeoffs. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 20(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2109084
Semetko, H. A. (2022). Political communication and campaigning in India: opportunities for future research. South Asian History and Culture, 13(3), 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2022.2093470
Sheep, M. L. (2023). Effective Communication and Persuasion. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 3639–3644). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2257-1
Stromer-Galley, J., Rossini, P., Hemsley, J., Bolden, S. E., & McKernan, B. (2021). Political messaging over time: A comparison of US presidential candidate Facebook posts and tweets in 2016 and 2020. Social Media+ Society, 7(4), 20563051211063464. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211063465
Walby, K., & Wilkinson, B. (2023). The visual politics of public police Instagram use in Canada. New Media & Society, 25(5), 898–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211015805
Wojcieszak, M., Menchen-Trevino, E., Clemm von Hohenberg, B., De Leeuw, S., Gonçalves, J., Davidson, S., & Gonçalves, A. (2024). Non-news websites expose people to more political content than news websites: Evidence from browsing data in three countries. Political Communication, 41(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2238641
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Editorial Team of Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan reserves the right to transfer the copyright of the article once it has been accepted and a decision has been made to publish it.
Department of Government Studies, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar in collaboration with Muhammadiyah’s College Association of Government Studies (AIPPTM) and Asia Pacific Society for Public Affairs (APSPA) as the publisher of Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan holds the copyright of all articles published in this journal.
The Publisher holds the right to reproduce and distribute the article and author is not allowed to publish the same article published in this journal.
Statement of Authenticity and Manuscript Copyright can be downloaded: here
After filling in the statement letter, please send via e-mail: otoritas@unismuh.ac.id
