Oligopolistic control elite in local corruption networks of Malang regency, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v16i2.19901Keywords:
political clientelism, patron-client networks, broker politics, corruption network, social network analysisAbstract
This study aims to describe how political clientelism networks function in the practice of corruption at the local level, with a focus on Malang Regency. By applying a qualitative approach through content analysis of the Supreme Court's decision on corruption cases involving RK and data analysis using NVivo 12 Plus software, this study highlights five main forms of political clientelism practices, namely fundraising politics, political bartering, transactional politics, collusive relationships, and intermediary politics. The findings indicate that political fundraising acts as a gateway to the creation of political contracts between patrons and clients, while political bartering and transactional politics mark the institutionalization of calculative and transaction-based reciprocal relationships. Collusive relationships and intermediary politics function as channels of communication and interaction between actors that maintain the stability of corruption networks through vertical integration between political elites, bureaucratic apparatus, and business actors. Social network analysis shows a hierarchical structure dominated by a handful of dominant actors as super-intermediaries with oligopolistic control over public resources.The results of the study contribute to the need for anti-corruption policies that focus on severing social networks of power, rather than merely imposing individual sanctions. The limitations of this study lie in its dependence on Supreme Court decision documents, so the recommendation for further research is to expand comparative studies between regions by utilizing field data in the form of interviews, observations, and relevant secondary data.
References
Agustino, L., Hikmawan, M. D., & Silas, J. (2023). Decentralization in Indonesia: From Reformation to the Local Regime. Public Policy and Administration, 23(2), 238–258. https://doi.org/10.13165/vpa-24-23-2-09
Ahmed, Z. (2025). Challenges to Anti-Corruption Efforts in South Asia: Political Patronage as An Obstacle to Transparent Governance in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. Insights-Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 3(1), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.71000/czqt1814
Akyeampong, B. (2024). The politics of beneficiary selection: A case study of Ghana’s Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) cash transfer programme. Global Social Policy, 24(3), 390–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680181241256471
Amankwaa, E. F., & Gough, K. (2021). Everyday contours and politics of infrastructure: Informal governance of electricity access in urban Ghana. Urban Studies, 59, 2468–2488. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211030155
Aminuddin, M. F., & Ramadlan, M. F. S. (2022). Elite in Sub-national Politics: Structure and Continuation in Post-authoritarian East Java, Indonesia. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 13(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.13.1.2022.1-22
Annisa, S., & Situmorang, B. (2025). The Role of Patronage in Shaping Indonesia’s Political Landscape. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi, 11(1), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v11i1.101319
Aspinall, E., & Rohman, N. (2017). Village head elections in Java: Money politics and brokerage in the remaking of Indonesia’s rural elite. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 48(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0022463416000461
Auerbach, Kiran Rose. (2021). Accountable to whom? How strong parties subvert local democratic institutions. Party Politics, 28(5), 865–878. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688211019720
Belyaev, D., Villeneuve, J.-P., & Mugellini, G. (2025). Framing corruption in Ukraine: a two-decade scoping review of academic and organizational perspectives. Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 33(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/25739638.2025.2457818
Berenschot, W. (2018). The Political Economy of Clientelism: A Comparative Study of Indonesia’s Patronage Democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 51, 1563–1593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018758756
Berenschot, W., & Aspinall, E. (2020). How clientelism varies: comparing patronage democracies. Democratization, 27, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1645129
Betts, A. (2021). Refugees And Patronage: A Political History Of Uganda’s ‘Progressive’ Refugee Policies. African Affairs, 120(479), 243–276. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adab012
Biermann, R. (2024). Conceptualising patron-client relations in secessionist conflict. A research agenda. Territory, Politics, Governance, 13(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2024.2318467
Browne, K. E., Razafiarimanana, C., & Jogannah, R. (2024). Informal institutions and “Imperfect Equity” in internationally financed adaptation in Madagascar and Mauritius. World Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106678
Chambers, Paul, Jitpiromsri, Srisompob, & Takahashi, Katsuyuki. (2022). The persevering power of provincial dynasties in Thai electoral politics. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 8(3), 787–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911221142132
Denissen, I. (2020). How democratization benefits brokers: a comparison of Mexico City and Khartoum. Democratization, 27(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1641695
Dosek, T., & Pozada, R. (2025). El clientelismo y la compra de votos en América Latina: lecciones de la comparación de Paraguay y Guatemala. Colombia Internacional, 122 SE-Análisis, 93–119. https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint122.2025.04
Dulay, Dean, & Go, Laurence. (2021). When Running for Office Runs in the Family: Horizontal Dynasties, Policy, and Development in the Philippines. Comparative Political Studies, 55(4), 588–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211024292
Ferazia, I., & Prayudi, S. A. (2020). Analysis of Communication Networks among Political Elites. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 18(1), 95–110.
Fossati, D., Aspinall, E., Muhtadi, B., & Warburton, E. (2020). Ideological representation in clientelistic democracies: The Indonesian case. Electoral Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102111
Ghazwani, M. (2025). Global Anti‐Corruption Commitments and Governance: The Moderating Role of CSR Committees: Evidence From G20 Firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3169
Goodfellow, T. (2020). Political Informality: Deals, Trust Networks, and the Negotiation of Value in the Urban Realm. The Journal of Development Studies, 56(2), 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2019.1577385
Haryanto, & Mahsun, Muhammad. (2024). Business and Politics in Urban Indonesia: Patrimonialism, Oligarchy and the State in Two Towns. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 43(2), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034241264574
Hendrik, H., Effendi, I., Zulkarnaini, Z., Yolandika, C., Mahary, A., & Effendi, I. (2024). Patron-Client relationships in capture fisheries business: A policy challenge. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(8), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.4675
Hidayat, A. R., Hospes, O., & Termeer, C. (2025). Why Democratization and Decentralization in Indonesia Have Mixed Results on the Ground: A Systematic Literature Review. Public Administration and Development, 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2095
Hidayaturrahman, M., sudarman, sudarman, Hamhij, N. A., Sugiantiningsih, A. A. P., Ubaid, A. H., & Elazhari, E. (2022). Political Broker Giving Money and Intimidating in Regional Head Elections in Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Sosial Dan Politik, 6(2 SE-Articles), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.19109/jssp.v6i2.10102
Higashijima, M., & Washida, H. (2023). Varieties of clientelism across political parties: new measures of patron–client relationships. European Political Science Review, 16(1), 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773923000309
Holzner, C. (2023). Clientelist Mobilization and Political Participation Outside of the Electoral Arena. Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública, 12(1), 41–68. https://doi.org/10.14201/rlop.31164
Jiang, J., & Zhang, M. (2020). Friends with benefits: Patronage networks and distributive politics in China. Journal of Public Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104143
Justesen, M., & Manzetti, L. (2023). Poverty, Partisanship, and Vote Buying in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 65(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2022.66
Kleinheksel, A. J., Rockich-Winston, N., Tawfik, H., & Wyatt, T. R. (2020). Demystifying Content Analysis. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(1), 2020. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7113
Koster, M., & Eiró, F. (2022). Clientelism in Northeast Brazil: brokerage within and outside electoral times. Contemporary Social Science, 17(3), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2021.1876244
Kovshov, N., & Vorozheykina, V. (2023). On the issue of the destructive impact of corruption on the institutions of modern society. Advances in Law Studies. https://doi.org/10.29039/2409-5087-2023-11-2-36-40
Kulmie, D. A., Hilif, M. D., & Hussein, M. S. (2023). Socioeconomic Consequences of Corruption and Financial Crimes. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.14714
Mabizela, H. (2024). Political patronage: A catalyst for corruption and misgovernance in South Africa. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(15), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd9627
Mabweazara, H., Muneri, C., & Ndlovu, F. (2020). News “Media Capture”, Relations of Patronage and Clientelist Practices in Sub-Saharan Africa: An Interpretive Qualitative Analysis. Journalism Studies, 21, 2154–2175. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2020.1816489
Marandici, I. (2024). Oligarchs, Political Ties and Nomenklatura Capitalism: Introducing a New Dataset. Europe-Asia Studies, 76(5), 739–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2024.2312117
Martinez‐Bravo, M., Mukherjee, P., & Stegmann, A. (2017). The Non-Democratic Roots of Elite Capture: Evidence from Soeharto Mayors in Indonesia. Econometrica, 85(6), 1991–2010. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA14125
Mexhuani, Fitim, & Mexhuani, Burim. (2024). Authoritarian neoliberalism debates: A critical review of the literature in central and eastern Europe. New Perspectives, 32(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X241230935
Mhazo, A., & Maponga, C. (2022). Beyond political will: unpacking the drivers of (non) health reforms in sub-Saharan Africa. BMJ Global Health, 7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010228
Motswaledi, T., & Maseng, J. (2024). An Examination of Political Patronage and Maladministration on State-Owned Entities with Specific Reference to South African Airways: A Literature Study. Journal of Politics and Law, 17(3), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v17n3p74
Mutawalli, M., Ayub, Z., & Faga, H. (2023). Revitalizing Political Parties in Indonesia: Dissecting Patronage-Clientelism Dynamics vis-à-vis Political Representation. Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia, 2(2), 301–326. https://doi.org/10.59066/jmi.v2i2.467
Oosterom, M., & Gukurume, S. (2022). Ruling Party Patronage, Brokerage, and Contestations at Urban Markets in Harare. African Affairs, 121(484), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adac017
Pavlović, D. (2023). How to approach state capture in post-communist Europe. A new research agenda. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 31(3), 960–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2022.2106951
Putri, F. R. D., Satria, A., Kinseng, R., & Taryono, T. (2024). Social Structure Analysis in Management of South Sumatra Inland Waters. Jurnal Ilmiah Perikanan Dan Kelautan, 16(1), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.20473/jipk.v16i1.48081
Ravanilla, N., Haim, D., & Hicken, A. (2022). Brokers, Social Networks, Reciprocity, and Clientelism. American Journal of Political Science, 66(4), 795–812. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12604
Salahudin, S., Nurmandi, A., & Loilatu, M. J. (2023). How to Design Qualitative Research with NVivo 12 Plus for Local Government Corruption Issue in Indonesia? Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 11(3 SE-Articles), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.113124
Saputra, N. A., & Setiawan, D. (2021). Fiscal Decentralization, Accountability and Corruption Indication: Evidence from Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.13.2021.29-40
Siburian, M. E. (2023). Fiscal decentralization and corruption: a case of indonesia. Applied Economics Letters, 6(11), 87–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2128164
Siddiqui, H. (2024). Review of Adam M. Auerbach and Tariq Thachil 2023: Migrants and Machine Politics: How India’s Urban Poor Seek Representation and Responsiveness. Princeton: Princeton University Press. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.56949/1ozd1188
Silitonga, M., Wittek, R., Snijders, T., & Heyse, L. (2023). Democratizing corruption: a role structure analysis of Indonesia’s “Big Bang” decentralization. Applied Network Science, 8(8), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-023-00535-w
Spyromitros, E., & Panagiotidis, M. (2022). The impact of corruption on economic growth in developing countries and a comparative analysis of corruption measurement indicators. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2129368
Thapa, S. B. (2025). An Analytical Study on Political Patronage Corruption in Nepal. Cognition, 7(1 SE-Articles), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.3126/cognition.v7i1.74767
Uddin, I., & Rahman, K. (2022). Impact of corruption, unemployment and inflation on economic growth evidence from developing countries. Quality & Quantity, 57, 2759–2779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01481-y
Vergara, C. (2019). Corruption as systemic political decay. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 47(3), 322–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453719868265
Vilchez, V., Paucar‐Caceres, A., & Werner, K. (2020). A systemic framework to evaluate political clientelism and citizens’ subjectivation processes. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2666
Wang, Y. (2020). A Network-Exchange Approach to Corruption: Brokers and Institution Spanning in A Chinese Corruption Network. Deviant Behavior, 41(12), 1636–1649. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2019.1640525
Yunus, N. R., Nasution, L., & Siti Romlah, S. N. (2021). Corruption as an Extra-Ordinary Crime: Elements and Eradication Efforts in Indonesia. In Journal of Creativity Student. https://doi.org/10.15294/jcs.v6i1.36057
Zhanbozova, A., Imangali, Z., & Digel, I. (2023). Analysis of corruption impact on the poverty level in Kazakhstan. Bulletin of “Turan” University. https://doi.org/10.46914/1562-2959-2023-1-3-354-367
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Editorial Team of Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan reserves the right to transfer the copyright of the article once it has been accepted and a decision has been made to publish it.
Department of Government Studies, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar in collaboration with Muhammadiyah’s College Association of Government Studies (AIPPTM) and Asia Pacific Society for Public Affairs (APSPA) as the publisher of Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan holds the copyright of all articles published in this journal.
The Publisher holds the right to reproduce and distribute the article and author is not allowed to publish the same article published in this journal.
Statement of Authenticity and Manuscript Copyright can be downloaded: here
After filling in the statement letter, please send via e-mail: otoritas@unismuh.ac.id
