PENERAPAN METODE KOOPERATIF TAI DALAM MENENTUKAN KALIMAT UTAMA PADA PARAGRAF SISWA KELAS IV SD INPRES PABARUNG KECAMATAN TOMBOLO PAO KABUPATEN GOWA

Amir Amir

Abstract


The purpose of this classroom action research is to know the ability of students to determine the main sentence in the paragraph through the application of cooperative methods TAI is expected to improve the process and results of learning Indonesian fourth graders Elementary School Pabarung District Tombolo Pao. The technique used in this research is a qualitative description. The class action research plan is implemented in two cycles. Each cycle has four stages: planning, implementation, observation, and reflection.

The results showed that there were 0% of students in very low category, 6.67% of students in randah category, 26.67% in medium category, 50% in high category and 16.67% in very high category. The average score in cycle I was 69.83 in the "moderate" category. Graduation percentage percentage of 56.67%. While the second cycle in the low category 0%, students in the category of 3.33% and 30% in the high category and 66.67% of students in very high category. The average score of the test results was 82.17% in the "high" category. Percentage mastery of the class of 93.33% ie 28 out of 30 students, meaning the results of this PTK expressed significantly increased.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abimanyu, Soli & Samad, Sulaiman. (eds). 2003 Pedoman Penulisan Skirpsi.

Fakultas Imu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Makassar

Anas Sudijono, 2005 ; Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan

Arikunto, dkk. 2008. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Biddulp & Osborne Teori Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme (file:///F: /teori-

pembelajaran-konstrktivisme.html, diakses 4 april 2010)

Dimiyati dan Mujiono. Hasil belajar (Pengertian dan Defenisi) Indra Munawar

(file://C; Documen and SettingsAdministratorDekstopHasil-belajar-

pengertian dan Defenisi, diakses 28 Nopember 2009)

Djamarah, S.B.2002. Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Hamalik, Oemar. 1982. Media Pendidikan. Bandung : Alumni.

Hannafin dan Peek (1998), file://D: Media Pembelajaran dalam Pendidikan

Weblog Yudi Nugraha SR. Htm, diakses 29 Nopember 2009

Klinger, S. 1987. Survei Metode Pengajaran Dalam Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam.

Terjemahan oleh Tim Konsultan SEQIP. Nurnberg: Fakultas Den

Universitas Erlangen.

Mulyo, Anton. Dkk. 1990. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Departemen

Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Cet. III : Penerbit Balai Pustaka

Oemar Hamalik. Hasil belajar (Pengertian dan Defenisi) Indra Munawar

(file://C; Documen and SettingsAdministratorDekstopHasil-belajar-

pengertian dan Defenisi. , diakses 28 Nopember 2009)

Ruseffendi, 1988; Pengantar kepada Membantu Guru Mengembangkan

Pembelajaran

Saidihardjo, 2005; Konsep Dasar Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial.

Sardiman, 2001. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar

Slamento. 2003. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka

Cipta.

Sudjana, N. 2002. Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru.

Sumaatmadja Nursid, 2001; Inovasi dan Padigma Baru dalam Pendidikan.

Suparno, 1997; Konstruktifisme dan Menyenangkan

Syah, 2000; Psikologi Belajar.

Umar, Alimin H. 2005. Statistika. Pengantar Kedalam Pemahaman Konsep dan

Aplikasi Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan UNM.

Wingkel Siuraya, 1993. Bimbingan dan Konseling di Institusi Pendidikan




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26618/jk.v4i1.1218

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Flag Counter